| Author |
Message |
 Topic: JAVA function - broker does not pick up imported package? |
moogoo
Replies: 3
Views: 4052
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:22 pm Subject: JAVA function - broker does not pick up imported package? |
| Thanks Jeff. Yup, I am trying to reuse a piece of JAVA code out there already instead of starting development from scratch in WMB. The "j2ee" jar is huge, almost 7 megs, and currently its ... |
| Topic: JAVA function - broker does not pick up imported package? |
moogoo
Replies: 3
Views: 4052
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:50 am Subject: JAVA function - broker does not pick up imported package? |
Hi All,
I'm in the process of creating a call to a JAVA function from WMB V6.0. Everything seems to be working ok except when the JAVA function calls the "DocumentBuilder" class from th ... |
| Topic: Broker Schemas |
moogoo
Replies: 4
Views: 6802
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 6:27 am Subject: Broker Schemas |
Thank mehedi...I'll do a read up on the PATH option for Broker Schemas...
MG |
| Topic: Broker Schemas |
moogoo
Replies: 4
Views: 6802
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:36 am Subject: Broker Schemas |
Got it, thanks Jeff. I'm going to have to rethink how we make use of Broker Schemas and what goes into them.
Thanks again!
MG |
| Topic: Broker Schemas |
moogoo
Replies: 4
Views: 6802
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:54 am Subject: Broker Schemas |
Hi All,
I'm in the process of trying to consolidate all of our database function calls into a single repository that would be held in a separate project. This would help us create, in essence, a l ... |
| Topic: WMQ/WMB Lead/Developer looking to transition career to Asia |
moogoo
Replies: 0
Views: 4583
|
Forum: Job Seekers Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:10 pm Subject: WMQ/WMB Lead/Developer looking to transition career to Asia |
| 7 years WMQ and 6 years of WMB experience, working in various roles ranging from designer to developer and to administrator. Currently employed stateside at a large finance company as technical lead, ... |
| Topic: Trouble calling External Oracle Stored Procedures in WMB 6.0 |
moogoo
Replies: 7
Views: 10447
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:39 pm Subject: Trouble calling External Oracle Stored Procedures in WMB 6.0 |
Ahh bugger...found out what the problem was. I was specifying the wrong schema all along. Duh. Thanks Jeff for all your help.
MG |
| Topic: Trouble calling External Oracle Stored Procedures in WMB 6.0 |
moogoo
Replies: 7
Views: 10447
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:35 am Subject: Trouble calling External Oracle Stored Procedures in WMB 6.0 |
Just heard back from the SA....looks like that option is checked. I'm stumped...does anyone have any other suggestions?
The one thing I'm finding out about implementing features I haven't used i ... |
| Topic: Trouble calling External Oracle Stored Procedures in WMB 6.0 |
moogoo
Replies: 7
Views: 10447
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 7:29 am Subject: Trouble calling External Oracle Stored Procedures in WMB 6.0 |
Did I say DBA? I meant our SA for WMB. I'll have him doublecheck that setting (its a Windows box which I don't have access to).
What exactly does that option do? If it wasn't checked, would PASS ... |
| Topic: Trouble calling External Oracle Stored Procedures in WMB 6.0 |
moogoo
Replies: 7
Views: 10447
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 6:22 am Subject: Trouble calling External Oracle Stored Procedures in WMB 6.0 |
| Thanks Jeff. Yup, we are using the Merant (DataDirect) driver and I'm currently checking with the DBA to make sure that the "EnableDescribeParam" you mentioned is enabled. But PASSTHRU is working pe ... |
| Topic: Trouble calling External Oracle Stored Procedures in WMB 6.0 |
moogoo
Replies: 7
Views: 10447
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:07 pm Subject: Trouble calling External Oracle Stored Procedures in WMB 6.0 |
Hi,
I'm trying to call an Oracle stored procedure using the "call procedure" functionality in WMB 6.0. Just a bit of background: we're currently able to call Oracle functions that return a single ... |
| Topic: Dequeued failed message |
moogoo
Replies: 12
Views: 42857
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 8:30 pm Subject: Dequeued failed message |
| Also, I've found it helpful to connect a trace node to the failure or catch terminals of the MQOutput node. It should give a clearer description of why its bombing out before rolling the message all ... |
| Topic: MRM XML doesn't differ between empty & nonexistant tags? |
moogoo
Replies: 10
Views: 10321
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:16 am Subject: MRM XML doesn't differ between empty & nonexistant tags? |
| Yup, validation is enabled on the Input node. In fact, when I was playing with the length constraints, I specified a fixed length for the new simple type and then entered data that was larger than it ... |
| Topic: MRM XML doesn't differ between empty & nonexistant tags? |
moogoo
Replies: 10
Views: 10321
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:54 am Subject: MRM XML doesn't differ between empty & nonexistant tags? |
| Hmmm...curious. I created a Simple Type Restriction element and put the minimum length of 1. I then updated the type of the element in question to the new simple type and deployed the message set to ... |
| Topic: MRM XML doesn't differ between empty & nonexistant tags? |
moogoo
Replies: 10
Views: 10321
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:14 am Subject: MRM XML doesn't differ between empty & nonexistant tags? |
| Ok, I think I'm starting to get it. There's a property upon creation of a simple type that allows for value constraints to be specified whether it be in the schema itself or in the message set in WMB ... |
