| Author |
Message |
 Topic: aggregate flow performance |
jgoldberg
Replies: 9
Views: 8220
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:15 pm Subject: aggregate flow performance |
The intermediary flow isn't much more than a noop. it has mqinput -> compute -> mqreply:
BEGIN
CREATE NEXTSIBLING OF OutputRoot.Properties DOMAIN 'MQMD';
SET OutputRoot.MQMD = Input ... |
| Topic: aggregate flow performance |
jgoldberg
Replies: 9
Views: 8220
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:06 pm Subject: aggregate flow performance |
The xmlnsc payload is about 200 bytes. I 512 (256*2) instances running of each flow. According to flow statistics, the bottleneck is the AggregateReply node.
I came here looking for advice on f ... |
| Topic: aggregate flow performance |
jgoldberg
Replies: 9
Views: 8220
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:32 pm Subject: aggregate flow performance |
reran with a single eg and again with multiple eg. FYI, I'm testing with `ab -c 100 -n 5000`
same eg:
3 item: 353/sec
13 item: 66/sec
two eg for fanin and two for fanout:
3 item: 420/sec ... |
| Topic: aggregate flow performance |
jgoldberg
Replies: 9
Views: 8220
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 2:41 pm Subject: aggregate flow performance |
I'm targeting aggregate performance. My flow consists of a fanOut/fanIn wrapped by http. I have 5 flows:
httpInput -> compute -> mqOutput(q1)
mqInput(q1) -> compute ->
aggregate ... |
| Topic: use HTTPConnector |
jgoldberg
Replies: 1
Views: 3168
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:03 pm Subject: use HTTPConnector |
| in the documentation for using the embedded http connector instead of the broker httplistener, it states "You must include both the HTTPInput and HTTPReply nodes in the same message flow, or depl ... |
| Topic: getting started |
jgoldberg
Replies: 3
Views: 3023
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:30 pm Subject: Re: getting started |
I tried to simplify my getting started test case to
HTTP Input -> HTTP Reply
When I go to test I get this error:
Status ERROR: com.ibm.etools.mft.bar code=0 null children=
Are you sure ... |
| Topic: flow fails |
jgoldberg
Replies: 2
Views: 1999
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:29 pm Subject: flow fails |
What you are missing is that the msgId / correlationId generated on the MQOutput node is to be found in the LocalEnvironment 
I'm glad everything is so well documented. Looking at the tr ... |
| Topic: getting started |
jgoldberg
Replies: 3
Views: 3023
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:10 pm Subject: getting started |
I tried to simplify my getting started test case to
HTTP Input -> HTTP Reply
When I go to test I get this error:
Status ERROR: com.ibm.etools.mft.bar code=0 null children=[Status ERROR: c ... |
| Topic: flow fails |
jgoldberg
Replies: 2
Views: 1999
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:37 pm Subject: flow fails |
I am evaluating message broker and am having problems running tests let alone completing development of a flow.
HTTP Input -> MQ Output -> MQ Get -> HTTP Reply
When I go to test it give ... |
