|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
Search found 5 matches |
Author |
Message |
Topic: MQ High Availablity testing |
etc181
Replies: 2 Views: 3046
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 11:50 pm Subject: MQ High Availablity testing |
Hi,
We are planning some testing where we get contact admin with MQ (Killing processes) on Linux. Unfortunately with the way linux reports under ps, we see all the threads as well as the processes (~177). ... |
Topic: MQ 5.3 Linux Clustering Pro's & Con's |
etc181
Replies: 15 Views: 14085
|
Forum: Clustering Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:45 pm Subject: MQ 5.3 Linux Clustering Pro's & Con's |
Hubert, yes, exactly shared Q's is the solution
But I don't have z/OS
Peter, absolutely not looking to reinvent the hardware cluster ( but will need to find one that is supported by the vendo ... |
Topic: MQ 5.3 Linux Clustering Pro's & Con's |
etc181
Replies: 15 Views: 14085
|
Forum: Clustering Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:11 pm Subject: MQ 5.3 Linux Clustering Pro's & Con's |
>The best solution is a combination of both - two QMgrs in a MQ cluster, each on a HA cluster node.
This is where I have been confused by the document. Whenever they talk about clustered Q Manag ... |
Topic: MQ 5.3 Linux Clustering Pro's & Con's |
etc181
Replies: 15 Views: 14085
|
Forum: Clustering Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:54 pm Subject: MQ 5.3 Linux Clustering Pro's & Con's |
Thanks Jeff,
In this case HA means 2 things:
1. The queue managers remain available (amongst other things we are using Process Choreographer)
2. It is important for any message in the system no ... |
Topic: MQ 5.3 Linux Clustering Pro's & Con's |
etc181
Replies: 15 Views: 14085
|
Forum: Clustering Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:58 pm Subject: MQ 5.3 Linux Clustering Pro's & Con's |
Hello,
We are Looking to deploy Websphere MQ 5.3 in a HA confguration. So far reading the docs it appears I have 2 options
1. One Manager & Queue on a box with a standby to take over. The Stan ... |
|
|
|