| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Issues about the type of properties? |
Terence
Replies: 7
Views: 3415
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 6:14 am Subject: Re: Issues about the type of properties? |
Mapping node is a nightmare, it is very strict.
Why I never use them except for really simple stuff. Once I get into any level of complexity I find ESQL much easier to get my head round.
Agree, I ... |
| Topic: Issues about the type of properties? |
Terence
Replies: 7
Views: 3415
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 6:13 am Subject: Issues about the type of properties? |
The problem, I believe, with the second message, is that the MQMD is in the wrong place....
Try moving the HTTP Response Header to before the MQMD, or move the MQMD to the last child before XMLNSC ... |
| Topic: Issues about the type of properties? |
Terence
Replies: 7
Views: 3415
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:58 am Subject: Re: Issues about the type of properties? |
Mapping node is a nightmare, it is very strict.
Why I never use them except for really simple stuff. Once I get into any level of complexity I find ESQL much easier to get my head round.
Agree, I ... |
| Topic: Issues about the type of properties? |
Terence
Replies: 7
Views: 3415
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:40 am Subject: Issues about the type of properties? |
Mapping node is a nightmare, it is very strict.
The input message properties type is changed from SOAPPROPERTYPARSER to MQPROPERTYPARSER, then all the mapping nodes complain the invalid error to t ... |
| Topic: How to wrap the aggregation flow with a synchronous WS? |
Terence
Replies: 9
Views: 3631
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 5:38 pm Subject: How to wrap the aggregation flow with a synchronous WS? |
| Sorry, I made a mistake in this thread, q1 and q5 use a same queue, q4 and q7 use a same queue. |
| Topic: How to wrap the aggregation flow with a synchronous WS? |
Terence
Replies: 9
Views: 3631
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:34 am Subject: How to wrap the aggregation flow with a synchronous WS? |
This Means q3 and q5 use the same backend queue.
In my test, I set q3=q5 and q7=q4
Set where? Certainly not on the MQReply node, which doesn't take any parameters?
The error was from system e ... |
| Topic: How to wrap the aggregation flow with a synchronous WS? |
Terence
Replies: 9
Views: 3631
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:37 am Subject: How to wrap the aggregation flow with a synchronous WS? |
Again you say failed, but don't say why. What goes wrong?
Thanks Vitor!
In my test, I set q3=q5 and q7=q4, the error is 'MQ back out to max number', there are 2 mqreply nodes in the 2 gr ... |
| Topic: How to wrap the aggregation flow with a synchronous WS? |
Terence
Replies: 9
Views: 3631
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 6:57 am Subject: How to wrap the aggregation flow with a synchronous WS? |
Sorry, I didn't describe my question clearly.
There are 2 groups of flows, aggregate flow and MQ facade flow
1. the aggregate flow
a) Fanout flow
MQInput (q1)->Aggregate control ->MQ ... |
| Topic: How we can invoke web service into message broker |
Terence
Replies: 18
Views: 6991
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:30 am Subject: How we can invoke web service into message broker |
| From the WMB tookit, open the Samples and Tutorials pages, you can find the Webservice samples |
| Topic: How to wrap the aggregation flow with a synchronous WS? |
Terence
Replies: 9
Views: 3631
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:23 am Subject: How to wrap the aggregation flow with a synchronous WS? |
Hi,
My aggregation flow is implemented by MQ nodes, I want to wrap the flow with a synchronous web service? I tried to leverage the MQ service facade request-reply pattern, but failed. There are 2 ... |
| Topic: Aggregation not parallel |
Terence
Replies: 2
Views: 2258
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 2:04 am Subject: Aggregation not parallel |
No.
Aggregate allows you to send messages to MQOutput nodes. These can then be read from MQInput nodes - which will run in parallel with each other - and they can send back requests that will th ... |
| Topic: Aggregation not parallel |
Terence
Replies: 2
Views: 2258
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 2:20 am Subject: Aggregation not parallel |
Hi,
I met a strange problem.
My message flow is dipicted below:
1)There are 2 branches after node 'Aggregate control'.
2) Either branch will call a common subflow.
3. There is a java compute no ... |
