| Author |
Message |
 Topic: RAC problem |
SpitFire
Replies: 1
Views: 1991
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:09 am Subject: Re: RAC problem |
In compute node, the message will PROPAGATE for some conditions depends on the counter.
While I < 5
If A
Is the exact ESQL written? Can you throw more information on the message structure ... |
| Topic: WBIMB Getting Started |
SpitFire
Replies: 23
Views: 13614
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:40 am Subject: WBIMB Getting Started |
...The WebSphere MQ queue manager WBIMB_BROKER.queue.manager associated with broker TestMsgBroker is not known to the Configuration Manager's WebSphere MQ queue manager...
IMHO, when the co ... |
| Topic: "Unable to open flow editor" when debugging. |
SpitFire
Replies: 15
Views: 12048
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:35 am Subject: "Unable to open flow editor" when debugging. |
| By the way, important to note that, the error I get is not really actual, as the flow editor IS opened in the end, but after every step in the debugger I get the error first and only after that I see ... |
| Topic: BIP2230 error. |
SpitFire
Replies: 2
Views: 5063
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 10:22 pm Subject: Re: BIP2230 error. |
Guys,
NOTE : In the compute node of Catch path, I am assigning a string value to the MRM message before passing the message to the O/p queue. And if i remove this statement and just retain the copy I ... |
| Topic: WBIMB Getting Started |
SpitFire
Replies: 23
Views: 13614
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 10:16 pm Subject: WBIMB Getting Started |
Now I did create another sample msg flow project did create a BAR file and deployed it. Still I have same problem. "Execution Group is not running".
Check if the following services are running ... |
| Topic: BO Modelling: Cardinality |
SpitFire
Replies: 1
Views: 2298
|
Forum: WebSphere Interchange Server + Adapters Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:37 am Subject: BO Modelling: Cardinality |
Hi all,
I would like to know if there is a way to retrict the maximum number of records(BO's) the adapter retrieves from the database.
Say, for instance I have modelled business objects as give ... |
| Topic: Aggregation without intermediate output |
SpitFire
Replies: 4
Views: 2817
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 3:36 am Subject: Aggregation without intermediate output |
Are you saying you want Compute1 and Compute2 to run in parallel? Why?
To reduce computation time, of course. Is that not possible? Can't they be run in parallel, say as jefflowrey quoted, I'm als ... |
| Topic: Aggregation without intermediate output |
SpitFire
Replies: 4
Views: 2817
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 3:10 am Subject: Aggregation without intermediate output |
You're not going to add any parallelism this way, unless you push Compute-3 into another flow.
Agreed. That's the plan I'm eventually going to adopt.
However, I'm getting stuck when I don't u ... |
| Topic: Aggregation without intermediate output |
SpitFire
Replies: 4
Views: 2817
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:32 am Subject: Aggregation without intermediate output |
Hi all,
I'm using WBIMB 5.0 and I'm trying a flow with aggregate (control, request & reply) nodes. The rough sketch of the flow is basically as follows:
(1) MQ In
(2) Agg Ct ... |
| Topic: Regarding xml file validation |
SpitFire
Replies: 6
Views: 3241
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 3:42 am Subject: Regarding xml file validation |
If you are on v6, the RCD node has a 'Parse Timing' property under 'General Message Options'. Set this to 'Complete'.
I guess the default value for this property is 'on Demand'; I had worked with ... |
| Topic: Regarding xml file validation |
SpitFire
Replies: 6
Views: 3241
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 9:08 pm Subject: Re: Regarding xml file validation |
In my present flow I am using a validate node to validate the input file. My flow design is
MQInputNode-->Compute Node-->Validate-->Further processing of message.
In the co ... |
| Topic: Message Modeling |
SpitFire
Replies: 4
Views: 3381
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:15 am Subject: Message Modeling |
I think you have two choices:
a) Implement a two-stage message flow in which you inspect InputRoot.XML.msgs and then re-parse and validate ( using an RCD node) using message definition N ( where N ... |
| Topic: Message Modeling |
SpitFire
Replies: 4
Views: 3381
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:13 am Subject: Message Modeling |
Hi thomeck,
Thanks for the response. However, I guess your solution won't work in my case.
IMHO, DTD's are used to model XML instances and are too document oriented, in the sense they can't pos ... |
| Topic: Message Modeling |
SpitFire
Replies: 4
Views: 3381
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 4:04 am Subject: Message Modeling |
Hi all,
I have a scenario in which the message flow picks up an XML(self-defining or MRM.XML) message, and then does thorough validation on the incoming data and then routes it some other destinati ... |
| Topic: XML to SOAP Conversion |
SpitFire
Replies: 2
Views: 2879
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:32 am Subject: Thanks for the pointer |
Hi elvis_gn,
Thanks for the info. I'm trying with the same. |
