| Author |
Message |
 Topic: [SOLVED]FMC38009E MQSeries Workflow API Error |
RudeJude
Replies: 7
Views: 7039
|
 Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Mon May 05, 2003 8:41 am Subject: [SOLVED]FMC38009E MQSeries Workflow API Error |
| If you use the api call workitems.terminate this will attempt to terminate the workitem only. Only the owner of the workitem can terminate it as well you can only terminate the workitem if it is one o ... |
| Topic: [SOLVED]FMC38009E MQSeries Workflow API Error |
RudeJude
Replies: 7
Views: 7039
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri May 02, 2003 11:08 am Subject: Thanks this is solved |
| We were using workitems.terminate instead of workitems.processinstance.terminate. |
| Topic: [SOLVED]FMC38009E MQSeries Workflow API Error |
RudeJude
Replies: 7
Views: 7039
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Thu May 01, 2003 3:02 pm Subject: [SOLVED]FMC38009E MQSeries Workflow API Error |
We are doing it through Java code on aix
Similar to this although this wont compile as is...
Agent agent = new Agent();
agent.setConfigurationID( configID );
agent.setName(n ... |
| Topic: [SOLVED]FMC38009E MQSeries Workflow API Error |
RudeJude
Replies: 7
Views: 7039
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Thu May 01, 2003 2:27 pm Subject: [SOLVED]FMC38009E MQSeries Workflow API Error |
| We are having a strange error appear in our terminate logs since we have did an upgrade to 3.3.2 SP4. All of a sudden when go to terminate a process instance based on a workitem we get a "FMC00119E No ... |
| Topic: Same WF fdl(with diff references to system)different systems |
RudeJude
Replies: 2
Views: 1718
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 12:50 pm Subject: Same WF fdl(with diff references to system)different systems |
We currently have 2 systems setup on our test box with so we can do changes in 1(sys02) and prod support in the other(sys01). Is it possible
to have essentially the same process model on 2 different ... |
| Topic: JDK Questions |
RudeJude
Replies: 4
Views: 2372
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2003 3:47 pm Subject: JDK Questions |
We are planning to upgrade to 3.3.2 amd currently use 1.2.2 jdk.
I looked on the ibm site and could not find there recommeded jdks
for each release. Does anyone know if we need to upgrade 1.2.2? I d ... |
| Topic: Overwriting process templates and impact to old instances |
RudeJude
Replies: 2
Views: 2004
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 5:25 pm Subject: Overwriting process templates and impact to old instances |
| Thanks John, this was what I suspected but just wanted to verify it and find out if there any gotchas. |
| Topic: Overwriting process templates and impact to old instances |
RudeJude
Replies: 2
Views: 2004
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2002 5:50 pm Subject: Overwriting process templates and impact to old instances |
| We have to cut in to production in a few months with a new fdl with some major changes to it. The question I have is when we overwrite the old process template and servers associated with that and upd ... |
| Topic: Purging Buildtime |
RudeJude
Replies: 3
Views: 1914
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:16 am Subject: Purging Buildtime |
Is there any easy way (ie command line) to purge all info in the
Buidltime database. Im finding that not having the ability to select more than one item in buildtime to delete cumbersome.
Thanks
... |
| Topic: MQseries Q Persistence |
RudeJude
Replies: 14
Views: 11712
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2002 11:06 am Subject: re: persistence |
John,
Here is an example of setting persistence for a single put to a queue using JMS... This uses application specific symbolic naming ie. DeliveryMode.NON_PERSISTENT would not be portable if we w ... |
| Topic: MQseries Q Persistence |
RudeJude
Replies: 14
Views: 11712
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2002 10:23 am Subject: re: persistence |
Yes there are numerous values that can be controlled by an application/programmmer via code. The MQadmin has the option to set
default persistence to yes or no. If they set it to no than its up to th ... |
| Topic: MQseries Q Persistence |
RudeJude
Replies: 14
Views: 11712
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2002 5:50 pm Subject: re: persistence |
| Funny enough I ran a couple of tests with my UPES Q's and if you turn off default persistence on the UPES Q's workflow submits the mesg regardless of default settings with the persistence option set f ... |
| Topic: MQseries Q Persistence |
RudeJude
Replies: 14
Views: 11712
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2002 11:21 am Subject: MQseries Q Persistence |
| Our MQseries admins our looking at turning off default persistence for all Queues going forward and letting the programmer decide whether he wants to set persistence or not. My question is since with ... |
| Topic: OO Design and Workflow |
RudeJude
Replies: 2
Views: 2004
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2002 1:50 pm Subject: re:OO Design and Workflow |
Try using the LOVEM modelling from IBM.
If you are referring to just designing the UPES's for PES's
then you should almost forget about workflow and treat it
as a black box. The UPES's job is to co ... |
| Topic: UPES and output containers |
RudeJude
Replies: 6
Views: 3059
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2002 5:35 pm Subject: UPES and output containers |
Thanks John...
Your confirmation solidified what my testing had shown.
Rude |
