| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Namespaces and attributes |
RichA
Replies: 5
Views: 2786
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2015 5:20 am Subject: Namespaces and attributes |
| Hi, right, now I think I've got it, I hadn't noticed the default namespace declaration and had previously thought they were all namespace prefix declarations. It's when I transcribed the message here ... |
| Topic: Namespaces and attributes |
RichA
Replies: 5
Views: 2786
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2015 3:45 am Subject: Namespaces and attributes |
That's fine, however this is some legacy code which I may or may not be allowed to change, at the moment let's assume that I cannot change it.
Can you see from the message whether the attributes sh ... |
| Topic: Namespaces and attributes |
RichA
Replies: 5
Views: 2786
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2015 2:54 am Subject: Namespaces and attributes |
Hi, I've got some message broker code which I am debugging and it seems to be interpreting some xml in an unexpected way.
So, it's reasonably complex, the message itself is made up of three layers, ... |
| Topic: Connectivity test |
RichA
Replies: 11
Views: 10599
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:14 pm Subject: Connectivity test |
| The MQ port of course. The problem was that whatever the device they've changed/put on the network responds to telnet requests so we were getting false positives, we thought we were connecting to the ... |
| Topic: Connectivity test |
RichA
Replies: 11
Views: 10599
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:46 am Subject: Connectivity test |
| Not a bad idea, I'll go with that one. Thanks |
| Topic: Connectivity test |
RichA
Replies: 11
Views: 10599
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:34 am Subject: Connectivity test |
There's now something to proxy the requests, this results in a TCP response regardless of whether we're hitting the target machine or not.
The blank screen is a windows thing, no idea if it's the sam ... |
| Topic: Connectivity test |
RichA
Replies: 11
Views: 10599
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:14 am Subject: Connectivity test |
| No, the telnet is using a listener |
| Topic: Connectivity test |
RichA
Replies: 11
Views: 10599
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:03 am Subject: Connectivity test |
Ok, does anyone know how to talk to a queue manager over telnet?
Up until a few weeks ago a response from a telnet request was sufficient to prove TCP communication between boxes. There was a change ... |
| Topic: MQRC 2009 |
RichA
Replies: 15
Views: 13530
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:35 am Subject: MQRC 2009 |
No program changes were needed. Just replace the IBM MQ Jar files. Done.
The JAR files at a different CSD level to the QM?
That would probably be easier to get approved, was that a client app or ser ... |
| Topic: MQRC 2009 |
RichA
Replies: 15
Views: 13530
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:11 am Subject: MQRC 2009 |
IC45588 JMS client application fail with 2009 (mqrc_connection_broken) at receive
This might be the one, although it does say client, if I show it to the people who make decisions they probably w ... |
| Topic: MQRC 2009 |
RichA
Replies: 15
Views: 13530
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 1:40 am Subject: MQRC 2009 |
Assume for a second that a simple restart didn't fix the problem. Or doesn't continue to fix the problem after the next Java patch. Or something.
There's not been a java patch for an age either, it's ... |
| Topic: MQRC 2009 |
RichA
Replies: 15
Views: 13530
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:09 pm Subject: MQRC 2009 |
The app's been working in basically the same way (MQ wise) since the dawn of time, it's been on CSD 7 since there was a CSD 7, it's been tested extensively in 3 different environments.
I accept what ... |
| Topic: MQRC 2009 |
RichA
Replies: 15
Views: 13530
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:00 am Subject: MQRC 2009 |
lol
just
lol |
| Topic: MQRC 2009 |
RichA
Replies: 15
Views: 13530
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:49 am Subject: MQRC 2009 |
| Recently we've started getting a bunch of 2009 errors from a java app that was last updated October last year, since January we've had irregular (but growing in frequency) occurances of 2009 errors it ... |
| Topic: MQESE/TAMBI |
RichA
Replies: 0
Views: 1951
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:41 am Subject: MQESE/TAMBI |
Where should I post a question asking for a quote on some training for the product in the subject of this message?
This seems like a reasonable place to start with, I might cross post to the MQ suppo ... |
