|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
Search found 5 matches |
Author |
Message |
Topic: Need some thoughts about authorization problem |
Metalman
Replies: 8 Views: 5708
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 7:17 am Subject: Need some thoughts about authorization problem |
i know i'm somewhat reviving an old thread, but i want vitor to see this at least.
a little bit of information i've seemed to neglect. the messages that they are having issues with, they are trying ... |
Topic: Need some thoughts about authorization problem |
Metalman
Replies: 8 Views: 5708
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 6:34 am Subject: Need some thoughts about authorization problem |
as I came into the office today, I just had a random thought. Even though it's displaying that level of access, could it be possible that the security wasn't refreshed and they don't actually have tha ... |
Topic: Need some thoughts about authorization problem |
Metalman
Replies: 8 Views: 5708
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 7:11 am Subject: Need some thoughts about authorization problem |
well, it's in the process of being suggested to the customer to see if it's the problem, i'll update that when i get word. |
Topic: Need some thoughts about authorization problem |
Metalman
Replies: 8 Views: 5708
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 6:20 am Subject: Need some thoughts about authorization problem |
something else that came to my mind, since I know it might be asked.
[/home/mqm]uname -a
AIX (server name) 3 5 0021C2AB4C00
I took out the name of the server, just to be safe. |
Topic: Need some thoughts about authorization problem |
Metalman
Replies: 8 Views: 5708
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 6:18 am Subject: Need some thoughts about authorization problem |
I've been working at this problem for a bit now, and everything that I've tried seemed to have lead to a dead end. Here's the story.
Back around Feb 19 (or whenever that Friday was before the weeke ... |
|
|
|