| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Looking for information about MQ9 "Backup Queue Manager |
Lepiota
Replies: 14
Views: 8740
|
 Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2022 6:16 am Subject: Looking for information about MQ9 "Backup Queue Manager |
My customer rejected the usual and well-proven backup choices, for reasons that make sense in their particular situation.
It will be reworked in a few months as part of a larger project.
Meanwhi ... |
| Topic: Looking for information about MQ9 "Backup Queue Manager |
Lepiota
Replies: 14
Views: 8740
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2022 2:41 am Subject: Looking for information about MQ9 "Backup Queue Manager |
Thanks for the responses. I'll try to cover all of them in one reply.
BTW I wrote some text covering why this situation is so strange, but removed it. It needed more information that I can share. ... |
| Topic: Looking for information about MQ9 "Backup Queue Manager |
Lepiota
Replies: 14
Views: 8740
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2022 12:58 am Subject: Looking for information about MQ9 "Backup Queue Manager |
We're doing a Unix to Windows migration, and trying to change as little as possible.
The setup of the original MQ environment is a bit eccentric. There are also some significant constraints in t ... |
| Topic: Looking for information about MQ9 "Backup Queue Manager |
Lepiota
Replies: 14
Views: 8740
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2022 6:17 am Subject: Looking for information about MQ9 "Backup Queue Manager |
I may need a "Backup Queue Manager" soon (using RESET QMGR TYPE(ADVANCELOG) etc)
I've never used it before and have a couple of questions (below).
NB: For now, MIQM isn't possible.
I' ... |
| Topic: Looking for ideas for sending messages via one QM to another |
Lepiota
Replies: 2
Views: 3504
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 8:58 pm Subject: Looking for ideas for sending messages via one QM to another |
The specific question(s) are a bit lower down.
First some background:
For what I'd call "historical reasons" we've been using an "uncomfortable" WMQ topology, with one Queu ... |
