| Author |
Message |
 Topic: CCSID in Tandem Itanium with MQ 5.3 |
AndyMQ
Replies: 2
Views: 3046
|
 Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 11:17 am Subject: CCSID in Tandem Itanium with MQ 5.3 |
| We're moving from 5.1 MQ on Tandem S-Series to 5.3 on Tandem Itanium. Our qmgrs are configured as S-series (via saveqmgr). Having problems sending messages to IBM mainframe. Have conversion Y on the ... |
| Topic: Native COBOL compiles on Tandem Integrity |
AndyMQ
Replies: 4
Views: 4437
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 5:22 am Subject: Native COBOL compiles on Tandem Integrity |
| Thanks. That's similar to the one we used for non-native Cobol under 5.1. Problem is it's all change under 5.3. We've finally got a non-native compile up and running tho' there were a few changes w ... |
| Topic: Native COBOL compiles on Tandem Integrity |
AndyMQ
Replies: 4
Views: 4437
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 1:56 am Subject: Native COBOL compiles on Tandem Integrity |
| Has anyone tried compiling native Cobol code under WMQ 5.3 on Tandem Integrity (Itanium)? Have installed 5.3.1.2 but don't appear to have any of the compile macros mentioned in the System Admin manua ... |
| Topic: MQ version 5.1 on Tandem Itanium |
AndyMQ
Replies: 7
Views: 7051
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 7:01 am Subject: MQ version 5.1 on Tandem Itanium |
I know that the version we run on S-Series installs with code 700 objects. They won't run on Itanium as the code type for native is 800.
My not-so-cunning plan had been to run instmqm and choose t ... |
| Topic: MQ version 5.1 on Tandem Itanium |
AndyMQ
Replies: 7
Views: 7051
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:53 am Subject: MQ version 5.1 on Tandem Itanium |
Thanks for that. I'd just wondered if anyone had actually tried it.
The support info states K-series and S-series (Dxx and Gxx) but as you said, it was out a long time before Itanium reared its ugly ... |
| Topic: MQ version 5.1 on Tandem Itanium |
AndyMQ
Replies: 7
Views: 7051
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:48 am Subject: MQ version 5.1 on Tandem Itanium |
Sadly, not the way we do things in here!
The hardware upgrade is because we're on the ragged edge in terms of performance, and continually adding inefficient code which is starting to push it over th ... |
| Topic: MQ version 5.1 on Tandem Itanium |
AndyMQ
Replies: 7
Views: 7051
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:18 am Subject: MQ version 5.1 on Tandem Itanium |
Is anyone running this version of MQ on the new(ish) Tandem Itanium platform?
Our plans are to upgrade our hardware from S-Series to Itanium (H), without having to go 5.1 to 5.3 first if we can avoid ... |
| Topic: LOCLADDR on Tandem MQ 5.1 Sender Channel |
AndyMQ
Replies: 2
Views: 3392
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 9:41 am Subject: LOCLADDR on Tandem MQ 5.1 Sender Channel |
| Official word from IBM is that LOCLADDR is not available on Tandem until version 5.3, despite the manuals claims of 5.1 availability. However, I can't find any record of this parameter in the Tandem ... |
| Topic: LOCLADDR on Tandem MQ 5.1 Sender Channel |
AndyMQ
Replies: 2
Views: 3392
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:52 am Subject: LOCLADDR on Tandem MQ 5.1 Sender Channel |
| We have an issue with TCPIPv6 on Tandem MQ version 5.1 Sender channels. IP failover is causing us problems. On the face of it, the LOCLADDR attr on the sender channel would seem to solve the problem ... |
| Topic: MQ 5.1, altmqfls, Tandem and RDF |
AndyMQ
Replies: 1
Views: 2646
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:54 pm Subject: MQ 5.1, altmqfls, Tandem and RDF |
| Has anyone come across this little rascal before? We created a new queue manager on our primary Tandem cluster, using RDF to allow all audited data to transfer to our contingency machine. We also pe ... |
| Topic: Tandem MQQSSVR memory |
AndyMQ
Replies: 5
Views: 3851
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 8:40 am Subject: Tandem MQQSSVR memory |
| Thanks Tibor, thats useful as it gives me something to do comparisons with. In general, our backup processes were consuming around doubles the memory of our primary processes. I can understand that ... |
| Topic: Tandem MQQSSVR memory |
AndyMQ
Replies: 5
Views: 3851
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 7:06 am Subject: Tandem MQQSSVR memory |
| We went with efix 3 as we had to apply the PATHSEC changes (an audit point). We're still only testing with this configuration, but we have around 8 or 9 MQQSVR processes running per node. Invariably ... |
| Topic: Tandem MQQSSVR memory |
AndyMQ
Replies: 5
Views: 3851
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 8:54 am Subject: Tandem MQQSSVR memory |
| Concerned at the amount of memory being used in our queue managers, specifically the queue service servers. We have created multiple MQQSSVR processes spread across all available CPUs, but the primar ... |
| Topic: MQPUT returned Reason Code 2053 but Q not full |
AndyMQ
Replies: 4
Views: 18347
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 8:43 am Subject: MQPUT returned Reason Code 2053 but Q not full |
| Strevo, have you checked the physical file? If you run a dspmqfls and find the actual underlying queue and overflow file names and check you haven't hit maxextents |
| Topic: MQ Explorer with Tandem MQ |
AndyMQ
Replies: 4
Views: 4063
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:30 am Subject: MQ Explorer with Tandem MQ |
| We went for efix1 as it was the latest at that time and it was the one our auditors were most interested in, specifically because it allowed you to better secure the Pathway environment (mqpathsec par ... |
