| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| IIB10 High availability - MQ topology |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| alaychem |
 Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 12:43 am Post subject: IIB10 High availability - MQ topology |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 66
|
I started reading about IIB high availability.
I couldn't understand from the IBM documentation, on implementing multi - instance pattern, if the MQ managers MUST be local, or they CAN be remote.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSMKHH_10.0.0/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/be13682_.htm
Other question, if QMGR can be remote, assuming that your message flows mainly contain MQ input and output nodes, would you preffer local or remote MQ?
Last edited by alaychem on Wed Jun 27, 2018 4:37 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
On IIB 10, you need a local queue manager if you want to use nodes that require me. If not, you don't.
If you need a queue manager under IIB and you set IIB to be MI, then the queue manager must be MI as well.
Using local or remote queue manager for application messages via mq nodes is an application design decision that the use of MI has no impact on.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| alaychem |
| Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 4:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 66
|
| Vitor wrote: |
On IIB 10, you need a local queue manager if you want to use nodes that require me |
What is "me"?
| Vitor wrote: |
Using local or remote queue manager for application messages via mq nodes is an application design decision that the use of MI has no impact on. |
I know, that's why it's "Other question"  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| alaychem wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
On IIB 10, you need a local queue manager if you want to use nodes that require me |
What is "me"? |
MQ when the spell check hates you 
| alaychem wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
Using local or remote queue manager for application messages via mq nodes is an application design decision that the use of MI has no impact on. |
I know, that's why it's "Other question" |
Okay, I prefer to use remote queue managers for application messages with MQ aware application (including IIB) cliented on to it.
Other topologies are available and may be better in your circumstances.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| joebuckeye |
| Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 365
Location: Columbus, OH
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
