| Author |
Message
|
| binayak.nanda |
 Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:24 am Post subject: mqsicreatebar issue . |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 29 Oct 2014
Posts: 17
|
Hello All ,
I am currently working on wmb 7 . I need to build bar file using mqsicreatebar command . For small no of flows it is working fine . But for large no of message flows it is not working , console gives error "too many parameters" . Then i researched , how toolkit builds , then i came to know it works in headless mode . I can not use mqsipackagebar as it is not there in wmb 7 . Can anyone suggest how to build bar file for large no of message flows using mqsicreatebar .
Thanks in advance . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| timber |
| Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Aug 2015
Posts: 1292
|
| Do you really need to put all of the flows into a single BAR file? Have you tried creating multiple smaller BAR files? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| binayak.nanda |
| Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 29 Oct 2014
Posts: 17
|
| Actually the project design is like this . Previously from toolkit bar file is build and deployed . Now planning to write build automation script . If this will not happen , then we have to go for multiple bars and change the design . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
| binayak.nanda wrote: |
| Actually the project design is like this . |
| binayak.nanda wrote: |
| then we have to go for multiple bars and change the design . |
Sounds like the design was done by someone who came from a J2EE background. Shove everything into one .war file and job done.
Most sites use individual bar files. Far better for maintainability in the long run.
Go for multiple bar files. You won't regret it in the long run.
Oh, and V7 went out of support almost a year ago.
Going for a multiple barfile design will make the migration to 'Applications' a lot easier.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| binayak.nanda |
| Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 29 Oct 2014
Posts: 17
|
| Can you suggest any way like ant or maven to build with the large message flows with mqsicreatebar ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2016 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| binayak.nanda wrote: |
| Can you suggest any way like ant or maven to build with the large message flows with mqsicreatebar ? |
There's no difference between running mqsicreatebar inside ant or maven, and from a command line. Except the framework you'd need with any ant script (paths, parameters, etc).
If mqsicreatebar doesn't work for you outside ant, it won't work inside ant.
I echo the comments of my associates, especially about using WMBv7. Over and above anything else, you're building a solution IBM won't support in Prod.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
