ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Aggregate Node Performance

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Aggregate Node Performance « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
PiyushGoel
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:30 pm    Post subject: Aggregate Node Performance Reply with quote

Newbie

Joined: 19 Feb 2014
Posts: 3
Hi,

i have developed 2 messgeflows

request flow:
(only one request will come at a time)
request may come from two diff sources(Xml message is same in both request) and after doing some transformation we are sending it to 3 diff target systems.

response flow:

response will come from all systems then we need to aggregate and send it to the respective source system.


now problem is :

if request is coming from sorce1 then total turn around time is less then 1 second.

but if same request is coming from source2 then turn around time is 9-10 seconds.


can any one suggest how to reduce the time for source2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 10:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
are you sure that it is taking longer for source2? How do you measure your turn around time? Would that be after or before commit of the request?
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
PiyushGoel
PostPosted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Newbie

Joined: 19 Feb 2014
Posts: 3
yes.. it is taking longer for source 2.

now i have added stub flow to generate the responce for all 3 target system.

so when stub flow trying to put the xml for source2 in a Queue then the flow is taking around 4-5 seconds.

while same stub for sourec 1 is not even taking 1 sec.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
PiyushGoel wrote:
yes.. it is taking longer for source 2.

now i have added stub flow to generate the responce for all 3 target system.

so when stub flow trying to put the xml for source2 in a Queue then the flow is taking around 4-5 seconds.

while same stub for sourec 1 is not even taking 1 sec.

find out what is different between the routing for both sources. Fix it.
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
PiyushGoel
PostPosted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 5:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Newbie

Joined: 19 Feb 2014
Posts: 3
i checked the properties of both messages. so i came to know source1 has persistant message and source2 has impersistance message.

now i make both request impersistant from MQMD. now both request is taking so long.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Aggregate Node Performance
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
  
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.