| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Limit of Receiver queue. |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| ankurlodhi |
 Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:43 am Post subject: Limit of Receiver queue. |
 |
|
Master
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 266
|
my actuall question is
Is it possible to have 17 transmission queues all going to 1 receiver queue? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
No. And yes.
No. Transmission queues do not aim at any other queues. There is no direct correlation between a transmission q on QM1 and a receiving q on QM2.
Yes. If the receiver q is on QM2, you can have transmission queues on QM1, QM3, Qm4, etc that all feed channels that go to QM2, and if security settings allow it and the programs are correctly coded, they can all send to that receiver q on QM2.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:54 am Post subject: Re: Limit of Receiver queue. |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
| Is it possible to have 17 transmission queues all going to 1 receiver queue? |
No, because transmission queues don't "go" anywhere. Any transmission queue can have messages for any number of possible target queues.
If your question (before it was filtered through your WMQ understanding) was "can I have 17 sender channels going to 1 receiver channel?" there are a number of possible responses; my choices being:
- Try it and see
- Yes
- RTFM
- Yes but be sure you understand the implications of doing that
If that's not your actual question, rephrase & repost.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ankurlodhi |
| Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 266
|
the condition is like this
there are 17 different queue managers on 17 differnet boxes sending data to one single queue manager.
so we can say there are 17 pair of sender and receiver channels but the receiver queue is same for all in the end. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9470
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
| ... but the receiver queue is same for all in the end. |
In WMQ-speak, the queue is a destination queue.
So, yes, many applications on many qmgrs can send messages to a single destination queue.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
| so we can say there are 17 pair of sender and receiver channels but the receiver queue is same for all in the end. |
No, you can't. There's no guarantee at all that the messages flowing over these channels are all destined for the same queue. You can't even say that all the messages are destined for a queue on that queue manager if you've got multi-hop in use in your topology.
Remember (or realise) that there's no equivalent of a transmission queue at the receiver end.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
