Author |
Message
|
alma |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:02 am Post subject: 2059 and 2009 again |
|
|
 Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Posts: 36
|
Hi,
I can not connect to a remote broker.
It is odd for me because it has already worked before.
I checked the channel, the listener and queue manager.
I read about SYSTEM.ADMIN.SVRCONN channel, it is not in queue manager.
I also tried the rfhutilc and it gave this error:
Quote: |
14.32.53 2537 Channel not available or all connections in use
2537 Channel not available or all connections in use
2537 Channel not available or all connections in use
Error getting queue names |
My question is what I should check yet?
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alma |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Posts: 36
|
I defined the SYSTEM.ADMIN.SVRCONN channel but it didn't help. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr Butcher |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005 Posts: 1716
|
don't run around headless defining objects that you may not require. find out which objects you are using and if they exist. did you try telnet to ip / port to verify you have connectivity? did you check the queuemanager log? what about the number of connections? did you verify you did not exhaust that? what has been changed between "it worked before" and "now" ?
2537 returncore reads:
Code: |
An MQCONN call was issued from a client to connect to a queue manager but
the channel is not currently available. Common causes of this reason code
are:
The channel is currently in stopped state.
The channel has been stopped by a channel exit.
The queue manager has reached its maximum allowable limit for this
channel from this client.
The queue manager has reached its maximum allowable limit for this
channel.
The queue manager has reached its maximum allowable limit for all
channels. |
did you verify all that? _________________ Regards, Butcher |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
Is it a zOS queue manager without a Client Connection Facility, and thus limited to only five client connections? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alma |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Posts: 36
|
Dear Mr Butcher,
I've read the lack of SYSTEM.ADMIN.SVRCONN channel would cause this type of error.
The telnet is OK.
I checked the channels and port.
This connection worked a half year before.I don't know what has been changed because I was given this task lately. I try to learn it nowadays.
There are no connections on queue manager, yet.
As regard queue manager log I have just read it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alma |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Posts: 36
|
It is on an AIX and I haven't the faintest idea about the limitation of connections.
I'll check up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alma |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Posts: 36
|
There are no any limitations in qm.ini. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
alma wrote: |
There are no any limitations in qm.ini. |
So it's just the normal default limit on connections then?
When you say "the connection worked half a year before" are you saying that no connections have been made to this queue manager in 6 months? It's been inert? If not, when was the last time a successful connection was made?
Has the AIX been restarted since the last successful connection?
When you say "the telnet is OK" does that mean you can telnet to the box (which proves nothing) or that you can telnet to the WMQ listener and see it react (which proves no network issues)? _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alma |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Posts: 36
|
What is the best device to read qm logs, please? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
alma wrote: |
What is the best device to read qm logs, please? |
Typically the disc device they're stored on.
If you mean "what application" then vi, cat or any other text based tool works fine.
If they look like rubbish, then you're looking at the queue manager's transaction log files. These are in a binary format and contain nothing of any value to you. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alma |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Posts: 36
|
Yes, it is a default limit on connections.
I connected to the server IP and the listener port by telnet.
Yes, the AIX was restarted due to a storage error. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
alma wrote: |
I connected to the server IP and the listener port by telnet. |
And have you located the response the queue manager logs now?
alma wrote: |
Yes, the AIX was restarted due to a storage error. |
When? Has a successful connection been made since?
Better information, better advice.
Or raise a PMR. And be guided on what to look for. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alma |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Posts: 36
|
Hm, my mother didn't tell me that this is just like Windows.
I restarted the queue manager and now it is OK.
Now again I thank you very much for helping me.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
alma wrote: |
Hm, my mother didn't tell me that this is just like Windows.
I restarted the queue manager and now it is OK. |
AIX tends not to be. In any sense. Including the "just restart it and it's fine".
I'd look (or get the sys admins to look) a bit closer at this "storage error" of yours.
But if it's working, that's a result.  _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JosephGramig |
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 1244 Location: Gold Coast of Florida, USA
|
I would be willing to bet that a process needed to make the connection died. That might indicate you system needs maintenance.
You might want to check that and apply maintenance as necessary. For both WMQ and WMB. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|