| Author |
Message
|
| vandemon |
 Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:46 pm Post subject: Is this the optimal way?? |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 32
|
I am creating an app that will send a msg from cilent to server n then server will reply back to the client. Following is the flow:
1)Client side app put a msg into a remote queue in client side WMQ
2)Then the remote queue will put the msg into a tranmission local queue in client side WMQ
3)There will be a sender channel at client side WMQ and a receiver channel at server side WMQ
4)A listener program will be open at server side before the starting of all the process. When the msg is being sent to server side via sender-receiver, listener program will listener to the receiving queue on server side WMQ and process the msg and put the processed msg into a remote queue in server side WMQ
5)Then the remote queue will put the msg into a tranmission local queue in server side WMQ
6)There will be a sender channel at server side WMQ and a receiver channel at client side WMQ
7)The client application will listen to the receiving queue on client and get back the processed msg
That's the flow. Is it the optimal way? Or there is a better 1? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| hunterKillerz |
| Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 40
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vandemon |
| Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 32
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| shashivarungupta |
| Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 1343
Location: Floating in space on a round rock.
|
| hunterKillerz wrote: |
http://www.web400.com/download/MQSeries/MQSeries.html
read this =X |
Link might have helped you BUT it was copyright in Y2000 and its not an IBM Document/tutorial/Pdf/Help/InfoCenter.
*Please do mention the docs/links that are IBM Supported !!
_________________
*Life will beat you down, you need to decide to fight back or leave it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Gaya3 |
| Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 2493
Location: Boston, US
|
| hunterKillerz wrote: |
http://www.web400.com/download/MQSeries/MQSeries.html
read this =X |
Please refrain yourself by posting this kind of links,which is not authorized or authenticated, whether its good or not, thats secondary here..
There are good number of links and documents available at IBM site, use it wisely.... 
_________________
Regards
Gayathri
-----------------------------------------------
Do Something Before you Die |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| SAFraser |
| Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Shaman
Joined: 22 Oct 2003
Posts: 742
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
|
| vandemon, You've described a classic server-to-server request/reply model. It is very sound. (Usually we would not refer to the originator of the transaction as the "mq client", as that implies a type of MQ install that differs from what you've described. ) Such a request/reply model can be designed to be synchronous (send/block) or asynchronous (fire-and-forget). Your choice is dependent upon the business requirement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
