|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
 |
|
Cluster in place, LB not working when msg put from broker |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
wraymore |
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:10 pm Post subject: Cluster in place, LB not working when msg put from broker |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 16 Aug 2005 Posts: 114 Location: Burlington, NC USA
|
Scenario:
System 1 puts message on queue that Broker MsgFlow gets from and does some transformation. Message flow establishes a destination list based upon info in the message matching to a cached routing table (the queue manager name is not specified). The queue that the broker puts to is a queue defined as clustered and this queue occurs on two queue managers that reside in a Cluster that also includes the queue manager where the broker resides. Issue: All of the messages destined for this clustered queue goes to only one of the queues (No Load Balancing Occurs).
Outside of the broker, manually we have successfully put messages from the queue manager to the clustered queue on the other qmgrs and load balancing works like it is advertised.
So how do we get this to work from the broker?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:41 pm Post subject: Re: Cluster in place, LB not working when msg put from broke |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
wraymore wrote: |
So how do we get this to work from the broker?  |
Make sure BIND NOT FIXED is specified _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fjb_saper |
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:49 pm Post subject: Re: Cluster in place, LB not working when msg put from broke |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20756 Location: LI,NY
|
Vitor wrote: |
wraymore wrote: |
So how do we get this to work from the broker?  |
Make sure BIND NOT FIXED is specified |
And if the queue exists in the broker queue manager make sure it has the ANY attribute in the right cluster parm (look it up). Otherwise the default is to only consider the local queue...  _________________ MQ & Broker admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shashivarungupta |
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 24 Feb 2009 Posts: 1343 Location: Floating in space on a round rock.
|
IBM gave this, please have a look at :
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=171&uid=swg1IZ23058
They say..this may resolve the issue of uneven load sharing in the cluster between queue managers.
As a separate note: if the queue, that is clustered among queue managers and having multiple instances with same name on more then one queue managers, to be deleted from the cluster queue manager(s) then it 'must' be first unshared from that cluster then removed/deleted.
If this is not done then this might cause an issue. _________________ *Life will beat you down, you need to decide to fight back or leave it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wraymore |
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 16 Aug 2005 Posts: 114 Location: Burlington, NC USA
|
Currently have a PMR in on this issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|