| Author |
Message
|
| Monk |
 Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 8:53 pm Post subject: cluster queue not showing up in cluster queue managers. |
 |
|
Master
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 282
|
Hi All,
I have 3 qmgrs , QM1 , QM2 and QM3.
QM2 is my Full repos.
i have created c/s channels b/n all of them and they are all running.
When i create a cluster queue on QM2, say cluster.q
this queue is not showing up in QM1 and QM3.
I have checked System.cluster.command.queue and depth is always 0 on all queue managers.
yet the cluster.q is not visible in the cluster queue managers.
How do make it visible?.
_________________
Thimk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| AkankshA |
| Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Singapore
|
try putting message on cluster.q giving queue manager name as QM1 or QM3 with amqsget..
if it works the queue is defined fine
the queue will only bne shown in mq explorer cluster tab, once a message has flown across
_________________
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
And having only one FR is a recipe for a future disaster. Try to get into the practice of always creating two FR's, even in small 'test' clusters.
The above is a personal, best-practice, view...
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 12:59 am Post subject: Re: cluster queue not showing up in cluster queue managers. |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| Monk wrote: |
| How do make it visible?. |
Use it. If you look in the Cluster manual (radical suggestion there, reading the documentation before randomly experimenting then posting that it doesn't work) you'll see that partial repositories only contain details of the cluster that they're using.
You'll also notice that you only have 1, not 2 full repositories in this cluster. This is a very stupid idea.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| exerk wrote: |
| The above is a personal, best-practice, view... |
It's actually IBM's recommended best practice.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
To add to my esteemed colleague's missive above, try this:
| Quote: |
| Full Repositories know everything about the cluster all of the time, Partial Repositories only know what they need to know, when they need to know it, but remember it. |
The above is good enough as a starting basis...
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| exerk wrote: |
| The above is a personal, best-practice, view... |
It's actually IBM's recommended best practice. |
True, however I was stating it as a personal view in context of a small cluster of three queue managers...it is sometimes hard to get it across to people, the need for two FR's even in a small cluster.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
