| Author |
Message
|
| Ross |
 Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:12 am Post subject: Trigger Batch CSQUDLQH |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 127
Location: Ireland
|
Hi,
I would like to invoke the Dead Letter Handler automatically when messages arrive on the DLQ.
I was thinking of setting Trigger to first, Process called DLQ. InitQ=??
Then define Process DLQ with AppType = MVS and AppID = TSO SUB 'DSN(MEM)'
Would this work?
Any better suggestions?
Thanks,
Ross. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:01 pm Post subject: Re: Trigger Batch CSQUDLQH |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| Ross wrote: |
Hi,
I would like to invoke the Dead Letter Handler automatically when messages arrive on the DLQ.
I was thinking of setting Trigger to first, Process called DLQ. InitQ=??
Then define Process DLQ with AppType = MVS and AppID = TSO SUB 'DSN(MEM)'
Would this work?
Any better suggestions?
Thanks,
Ross. |
Define your rules so that they leave the system DLQ blank and redistribute to multiple error queues in the original DLQ format.
Run the rules with WAIT(YES).
Enjoy 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mr Butcher |
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716
|
i did not check MQV7 manuals but from the older mq versions you will need a batch trigger monitor to make mqseries trigger a batch job. there is a sample on the mq supportpac page.
_________________
Regards, Butcher |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ross |
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 127
Location: Ireland
|
So it looks like better options are:
1) As abhove with Batch Trigger Monitor running. (MA12)
Is this necessary? Is there a way to have MQ issue the TSO SUB 'dsn' command in ISPF?
2) Run CSQDLQH all the time => WAIT(YES)
I don't want to remove the SYSTEM DLQ option. Don't want to change the current setup too much.
Any other ideas?
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| cschneid |
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 13
|
Be advised that there may be resistance to the existence of MA12 as a long-running task in your system.
- it does not respond to operator commands (other than the usual CANCEL and FORCE sort)
- there is no provision for configuration change/refresh without stopping and restarting
- the jobs it submits are not under the control of your job scheduling package
These items may be of no concern to you, but your operations staff, security staff, or z/OS Sysprog(s) may have issues with them. This may be one of those situations where asking first is easier than apologizing later. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bobbee |
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 20 Sep 2001
Posts: 545
Location: Tampa
|
| yes it is bettr to ask first, but you can implement MA12 to align with how they would want it to interface with their requirements. At a NY bank we used AFOper way back when. I know people who have said they have it working with CA7. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| cicsprog |
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 27 Jan 2002
Posts: 347
|
What's your monitor for MQ?
TMON has a built in DLQ handler. With Omegeamon you can write a Situation and have it send a message to MVS SYSLOG where you Auto Ops software can react upon that DLQ. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ross |
| Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 127
Location: Ireland
|
I'm prefering the option of running the DLQH with wait = yes. It seems to fit the bill.
I assume it can be run as an STC, but I'll look into this further.
My monitor is MainView. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mr Butcher |
| Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716
|
yes, the dlqh can run as a stc, we do the same.
| Code: |
//QMGRDLQH PROC
//*
//* DEAD LETTER HANDLER STC FOR QMGR QUEUEMANAGER
//*
//DLQ EXEC PGM=CSQUDLQH,PARM='QMGR.DEAD.QUEUE QMGR',
// TIME=1440
//STEPLIB DD DSN=MQS.SCSQANLE,DISP=SHR
// DD DSN=MQS.SCSQAUTH,DISP=SHR
// DD DSN=MQS.SCSQLOAD,DISP=SHR
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD DISP=SHR,DSN=pds.of.rule.tables(qmgrrulemember)
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*,
// DCB=(DSORG=PS,RECFM=VBA,LRECL=133,BLKSIZE=137)
// PEND |
_________________
Regards, Butcher |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| Quote: |
| I assume it can be run as an STC, but I'll look into this further. |
The difference between a traditional batch job and a started task is the lack of a JOB statement in a started task. And, of course, the started task takes a START command of some kind.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ealcantara |
| Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 16 May 2005
Posts: 13
|
Mr Butcher,
what do u do to finalize DLQH running as STC ?
Eros Alcantara |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mr Butcher |
| Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716
|
If you want to stop the DLQH while MQ stays up get-disable the dead letter queue.
the DLQH stops automatically if MQ shuts down (i assume it uses fail-if-quiescing)
_________________
Regards, Butcher |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ross |
| Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 127
Location: Ireland
|
Is there any way to end CSQUDLQH cleanly?
I'm trying to get an operator command other than Cancel!!
And I can't realistically Get Disable the DLQ to do this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mr Butcher |
| Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716
|
no
_________________
Regards, Butcher |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ross |
| Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 127
Location: Ireland
|
Cheers.
Thanks for your help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
