| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| D-Queing. Message tranfer without creation of RC |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| asudhakar |
 Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: D-Queing. Message tranfer without creation of RC |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 116
Location: Bangalore
|
Hi 2 all.
In Distributing Queuing, we have to create,
1. Remote queue
2. Transmission queue
3. Sender and Receiver channel.
But i have a situation. Configure D-Q. without creation of Receiver channel.
(I think there is a solution like. when we send data automatically create receiver channel)
Can any one helps me.
_________________
WebSphere MQ, MB Support and Admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:08 pm Post subject: Re: D-Queing. Message tranfer without creation of RC |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| asudhakar wrote: |
Hi 2 all.
In Distributing Queuing, we have to create,
1. Remote queue
2. Transmission queue
3. Sender and Receiver channel.
But i have a situation. Configure D-Q. without creation of Receiver channel.
(I think there is a solution like. when we send data automatically create receiver channel)
Can any one helps me. |
Have you tried switching the receiver channel for a requester channel?
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| AkankshA |
| Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:44 pm Post subject: Re: D-Queing. Message tranfer without creation of RC |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Singapore
|
| asudhakar wrote: |
Hi 2 all.
In Distributing Queuing, we have to create,
1. Remote queue
2. Transmission queue
3. Sender and Receiver channel.
But i have a situation. Configure D-Q. without creation of Receiver channel.
(I think there is a solution like. when we send data automatically create receiver channel)
Can any one helps me. |
you have to set CHAD(don remember the exact name of this attribute) as enabled for both the sending and receiving QM
_________________
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
If you don't want to define a lot of channels, clustering is probably a better / more secure bet than auto-defined channels, which still rely on sender channels.
Remember that while it's best practice to have dedicated sender/receiver channels, it's legal to have a single receiver on a queue manager and point all the senders at it. Not recommended, but might suit your topology.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
