ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » MQ explorer changes

Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next
 MQ explorer changes « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
krisrock
PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 1:49 pm    Post subject: MQ explorer changes Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Posts: 65

Is there any way by which we can track the changes made thro' MQ explorer?

thanks in advance
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:43 pm    Post subject: Re: MQ explorer changes Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

chandrasekaranr wrote:
Is there any way by which we can track the changes made thro' MQ explorer?

thanks in advance


Search some posts here... You might want to have a look at MQDocument etc... (looking for posts from M. Dag will help)
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

I am forced by circumstances to suggest MS03 as a viable alternative to MQDocument.

It all depends on what your requirements for "tracking changes" are.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

jefflowrey wrote:
I am forced by circumstances to suggest MS03 as a viable alternative to MQDocument.

It all depends on what your requirements for "tracking changes" are.


Agreed and I thought about it. I also must confess that we use it to such purpose and store the output to subversion, periodically.

However if you need to present the changes made to management MQDocument and MQArchitect output wins the presentation day...

(You think if my management reads this they'd be willing to pay for a licence?)


_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jsware
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chevalier

Joined: 17 May 2001
Posts: 455

fjb_saper wrote:
I also must confess that we use it [MS03] to such purpose and store the output to subversion, periodically.
We also do this and it works great. A script parses a list of servers, using MS03 to saveqmgrc against known port number usage (1414 etc.)

With MQ6 being rolled out and the latest MS03, it also creates authorisation files which get added to Subversion. We also get the script to email the team a svn status summary so any new/modified qmgrs get listed with a handy "M" or "A" prefix letter at the beginning.
_________________
Regards
John
The pain of low quaility far outlasts the joy of low price.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722

John,
How detailed does you change report get? Does it show what was changed on a QM? Or just that today's MS03 file is somehow slightly different than yesterday's and you have to go hunt for the change if so inclined?

We keep a rolling 30 days of MS03s for each QM in a central location. I would love to get a report daily showing me what objects are new, what got deleted, and if something changed, how.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

Peter - If you ran stuff on Unix, rather than windows... the command "diff" might give you what you need...

Also, because John is storing these files in a source control/version control system (presumably under the same name)- that tool is going to always do a DIFF anyway, and save only the changes. So you could likely get the same report if you stored your 30 days in CVS or SVN or CC or PVCS or etc etc etc. Most of these tools have the option to provide a web interface to see change history on a file.

Then you change the name of the ms03 output file at whatever interval you need to take a "checkpoint", or change the scripted options to cause the version control system to mark the file as a new "release" rather than "version" or etc.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722

Hmmm, we have PVCS, we store all our WBIMB stuff there.

We'll research if PVCS could spit this info out if I put all my MS03 out put there.

If I could get a compiled version of the MS03 client for Linux I would move it over there. Last time I tried I gave up. It was impossible to find a compiler. That was a couple of years ago though.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

I'm sure the current maintainer of MS03 would be happy to assist with any compilation problems. Linux has always been a targeted release, as far as I'm aware anyway. I'm surprised you had trouble at all, and twice as surprised if you didn't get assistance if you had asked for it.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RogerLacroix
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 3264
Location: London, ON Canada

jefflowrey wrote:
I'm sure the current maintainer of MS03 would be happy to assist with any compilation problems.



Me, myself & I scenarios???

Regards,
Roger Laccroix
_________________
Capitalware: Transforming tomorrow into today.
Connected to MQ!
Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Michael Dag
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 2607
Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam)

PeterPotkay wrote:
We keep a rolling 30 days of MS03s for each QM in a central location. I would love to get a report daily showing me what objects are new, what got deleted, and if something changed, how.

duh! get the trial ...
_________________
Michael



MQSystems Facebook page
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

RogerLacroix wrote:
Me, myself & I scenarios???


I was hoping for at least one in there...
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jsware
PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chevalier

Joined: 17 May 2001
Posts: 455

PeterPotkay wrote:
John,
How detailed does you change report get? Does it show what was changed on a QM? Or just that today's MS03 file is somehow slightly different than yesterday's and you have to go hunt for the change if so inclined?
The report emailed to the team gives a summary of changes (M = Modified, A=Added qmgr). This is basically the "svn status" output before committing the changes/additions to the repository. Subversion keeps a history of what has changed. Thus you can show the differences between Subversion repository revisions to see exactly what has changed. I would hope that other version control systems can do the same too.
_________________
Regards
John
The pain of low quaility far outlasts the joy of low price.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

jefflowrey wrote:
Peter - If you ran stuff on Unix, rather than windows... the command "diff" might give you what you need..

Doesn't FC do the same in DOS ?
FC like in file compare
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

fjb_saper wrote:
jefflowrey wrote:
Peter - If you ran stuff on Unix, rather than windows... the command "diff" might give you what you need..

Doesn't FC do the same in DOS ?
FC like in file compare


Hey, lookit that.

I guess so. Never knew that command existed! cool.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next Page 1 of 2

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » MQ explorer changes
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.