ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Mapping Node vs ESQL

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Mapping Node vs ESQL « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
MQWizard
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:48 am    Post subject: Mapping Node vs ESQL Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 13

I am on MB version 5 fp 5. I have a message flow which transforms from a CWF Format to MRM XML format. the structure has around 965 fields and has some simple and some complex transformation.

We did a prototype, where we mapped around 55% of fields and we did it with a mapping node.

The kind of performance we are getting is 8 msgs/second with one execution group and 5 threads of the flow. The broker is deployed on the AIX Box with 3 CPU and 8 GB of memory. we find this as too slow. I did run a mqsichangeflowstats report and it suprisingly showed only 10000 millisecond consumed in the mapping node.

To improve the performance at this point, I am asking developers to modify the flow to use esql instead of mapping node. My understanding is in MB 5, mapping node uses mapping configuration from the broker db. But I am in a dilema, because conceptually I feel I need to opt for esql but practically the results of mqsichangeflowstats aren't encouraging me to take my discussion.

Pls throw your point of view on this topic.

Just to mention here the messages are persistent...
thanks
_________________
Wizard Leads the way
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

Using broker V6 we noticed that ESQL mapping was about 20% faster than using a mapping node.

But this was done on our own messages with our own particular quirks.

What I am trying to say is that you must test for yourself and decide. No 2 results are the same.

Enjoy
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Mapping Node vs ESQL
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.