| Author |
Message
|
| czaszek |
 Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 5:25 am Post subject: Rfhutilc connection problem. |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 30 May 2006
Posts: 36
Location: Poland
|
hi All
I am trying to connect to my remote queue manager (MQ5.3) from my WinXP laptop using rfhutilc.exe.
I do not a direct connection to the linux box so I am connecting via ssh (using putty) and tunneling 1414 port from a linux box to my laptop.
When I test the connection from my laptop (telnet localhost 1414) I works fine, but when I try to connect via rfhutilc, it shows:
"2059 Queue manager not available (Connect) - may not be started"
In the rfhutilc I entered:
in the Queue Manager Name (to connect to):
SYSTEM.DEF.SVRCONN/TCP/localhost(1414)
Queue name:
QUEUE_NAME_TO_BROWSE
Additionally I have tested these settings on one of Windows boxes located in our server room, which has a direct connection to the linux box, instead of "localhost" I have used an IP address and it works fine.
(I tested 127.0.0.1 instead of localhost on my laptop, it does not help).
Have anyone of You faced problems like that?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Lukas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| wschutz |
| Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 3316
Location: IBM (retired)
|
I've no experience with tunnelling via putty, but have you tried using amqsputc.exe with a MQSERVER variable to see if you can get that to work first?
_________________
-wayne |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 5:40 am Post subject: Re: Rfhutilc connection problem. |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| czaszek wrote: |
in the Queue Manager Name (to connect to):
SYSTEM.DEF.SVRCONN/TCP/localhost(1414) |
What part of the documentation for RFHUTILC told you that syntax would function in that field?
Try the following from a windows command prompt.
| Code: |
c:\>set MQSERVER=SYSTEM.DEF.SVRCONN/TCP/localhost(1414)
c:\>rfhutilc |
Also, use netstat to make sure that 1414 is already tunnelled and working.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 2:19 pm Post subject: Re: Rfhutilc connection problem. |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20767
Location: LI,NY
|
| jefflowrey wrote: |
| czaszek wrote: |
in the Queue Manager Name (to connect to):
SYSTEM.DEF.SVRCONN/TCP/localhost(1414) |
What part of the documentation for RFHUTILC told you that syntax would function in that field?
Try the following from a windows command prompt.
| Code: |
c:\>set MQSERVER=SYSTEM.DEF.SVRCONN/TCP/localhost(1414)
c:\>rfhutilc |
Also, use netstat to make sure that 1414 is already tunnelled and working. |
Don't know about the part of the documentation. Tool is so intuitive I haven't read it. But this works for me:
in qmgr field
SYSTEM.ADMIN.SVRCONN/TCP/targethost(port)
Although I must say I do not tunnel the port. We have it open in the firewall.
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| czaszek |
| Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 30 May 2006
Posts: 36
Location: Poland
|
I have tested the tunnel using netstat:
TCP 127.0.0.1:1414 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
I have also added the server connection:
set MQSERVER=SYSTEM.DEF.SVRCONN/TCP/localhost(1414)
I have chosen this connection in the Queue Manager Name.
Unfortunatelly I still have got:
2059 Queue manager not available (Connect) - may not be started
Any idea? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| wschutz |
| Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 3316
Location: IBM (retired)
|
Try using amqscnxc and see if you can connect with that:
| Quote: |
Usage:
amqscnxc [-x ConnName [-c SvrconnChannelName]] [QMgrName]
|
If that works, then your problem is either with the MQSERVER variable or rhfutilc itself. If it doesn't work, then I'd suspect your putty tunnel.
_________________
-wayne |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| wschutz wrote: |
| If it doesn't work, then I'd suspect your putty tunnel. |
That's only because you've never done an ssh tunnel of the MQ listener port.
If the port shows up as LISTENING in netstat, then the tunnel is working.
amqscnxc is the tool to use to verify.
Apparently it's valid syntax to use the MQSERVER values in the rfhutilc queue manager name - I didn't know that!
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jbanoop |
| Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 401
Location: SC
|
Anybody got a solution for this ?
I am getting the same problem. Environment is MQ V 6.0 and RFHUTIL 4.0.4.
the QMGR is on AIX and the machine I am trying from is WinXP.
The MQExplorer on the same machine shows the concerned queue manager.
However when i use rfhutilc i get a message saying 2059 Queue manager not available (Connect) - may not be started.
I am able to telnet the qmgr port on AIX successfuly.
the MQSERVER variable is set to SYSTEM.ADMIN.SVRCONN/TCP/10.1.53.112(1415).
any suggestions are really welcome..
Regards,
Anoop |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
does amqscnxc work?
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20767
Location: LI,NY
|
| czaszek wrote: |
I have tested the tunnel using netstat:
TCP 127.0.0.1:1414 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
|
On which machine? While in the ssh session?
| czaszek wrote: |
I have also added the server connection:
set MQSERVER=SYSTEM.DEF.SVRCONN/TCP/localhost(1414)
I have chosen this connection in the Queue Manager Name.
Unfortunatelly I still have got:
2059 Queue manager not available (Connect) - may not be started
Any idea? |
If you are truely using 127.0.0.1 and or localhost this means you have very little understanding of TCP/IP or the network. You will never get out of your machine with this ip address. So how will you ever connect from your laptop to the foreign host with this address? -- Guess what the answer is NEVER EVER.
Try replacing the localhost with the ip you use for ssh.
Now if your tunnelling really exposes this as a local connection you have a different problem. I have seen this behavior if the user running the mqlistener has no permissions on the qmgr.
Enjoy 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Last edited by fjb_saper on Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:03 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
FJ -
It's perfectly reasonable to use localhost when one has used SSH to tunnell a remote port to a port on the local machine.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20767
Location: LI,NY
|
I must admit my experience with SSH tunnelling is limited to X11. In this case you still have at each end to notify the destination using the other's IP address and not your own.
Like I said after the edit, if the tunnelling truely exposes it as a local service I strongly suspect that the mqlistener might be running under a user with no mq priviledges: like root but not part of the mqm group... This would explain the behavior. Which ever way you want to connect (sender channel, svrconn, etc) you will get the QMGR not available response...
Thanks for clarifying my poor understanding of TCP/IP
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jbanoop |
| Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 401
Location: SC
|
Sorry for not clarifying these points :
In my case I am not using tunnelling. Its a normal connection frm winXP to aix.So i guess the question of problems during tunneling need not be considered.
Also my qmgr is on an aix box listening on 1415 port and all these steps I have discussed are related to connecting frm that winxp box to AIX box using rfhutilc (MQ explorer works).
So I guess my problem is the same as czaszek's but without the issue of tunneling and also that my qmgr is not on the local machine (however the port for the qmgr can be telnetted from the winxp machine).
Just as a note ..the admin server conn channel has a user id set on the MCA.
The is amqscnxc also not working:
>amqscnxc -x 10.1.53.112(1415) -c SYSTEM.ADMIN
.SVRCONN EEAX431P
Sample AMQSCNXC start
Connecting to queue manager EEAX431P
using the server connection channel SYSTEM.ADMIN.SVRCONN
on connection name 10.1.53.112(1415).
MQCONNX ended with reason code 2059
Regards,
Anoop |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20767
Location: LI,NY
|
Another reason for unexpected Qmgr Not available is a blip in the network and too many channels open due to the network instability. User's programs reconnect without getting disconnected and you rapidly hit the max channel.
Usually doing a force shutdown and restart of the offending channel(s) solves that problem...
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5867
Location: UK
|
| I always use the AMQCLCHL.TAB file with RFHUTILC, works fine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
