| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| bar v/s par |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| mbmb |
 Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:26 am Post subject: bar v/s par |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 12
|
If there are java nodes in the application, which is the better way to package - bar or par. If we expose java functionality thru java compute node, bar file creation brings in the java node's jar file as well in the bar but doesnt include other dependent libraries. But this can be done for par.
Pl advice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
I think PAR files are only for plugins, not for flows, sets, and java compute nodes.
That is, I don't know if configmgr/cmp will deploy a par file for you.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqmatt |
| Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 1213
Location: Hursley, UK
|
| jefflowrey wrote: |
| I don't know if configmgr/cmp will deploy a par file for you. |
It won't. The Config Manager will only deploy XSL, XML, JAR, CMF and dictionary files contained within broker archives.
-Matt |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
