| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Performance |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| snan2020 |
 Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2003 5:57 am Post subject: Performance |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 36
|
Hi Folks  ,
I know that mapping the whole data sturucture from one activity to another activity gives the best performance. But, some of the activities in the model need only very few data fields. What do you experts say about this, to get the best performance?
1) Should I use one whole big data structure for all the activities or Should I use different data structures and map the individual fields to the required activities?
Thanks in advance
Snan . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jmac |
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2003 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Snan:
Be careful here, while I agree that from the workflow engines perspective that a single data structure used at all activities MIGHT give better performance, this is definitely not true from the perspective of the database. I think you should be able to see that at a minimum the database footprint will be bigger if you use a single datat structure for the entire process.
My method is to have only those fields that are necessary at each activity.
Hope this helps... remember, this is just my opinion, when it comes to performance there is rarely a single RIGHT answer.
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| snan2020 |
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2003 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 36
|
Thanks Jmac
I decided to go with mapping individual fields.
Snan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
