| Author |
Message
|
| Ratan |
 Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 4:43 pm Post subject: [SOLVED]UPES From Container |
 |
|
Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245
|
When I am setting the UPES fully Qualified name in a Data member and setting to Execution of an Activity to UPES From Container, Workflow is throwing an Exception. The same is working if I specify just the UPES name and not the fully Qualified UPES name for PES from Container.
Am I doing anything wrong?
The exception thrown is
<![CDATA[FmcAssertionException, Condition=*** Pre-condition failed in e:\v332\src\fmcmpeid.hxx(101): name.Length() < FMC_SERVER_NAME_LENGTH]]>
_________________
-Ratan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Ratan |
| Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245
|
Has anybody used UPES 'From Container' setting for an activity?
_________________
-Ratan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Ratan:
Not me, that's why I haven't replied  . The only thing that I can see when taking a quick look is that the order is ServerName.SYSTEMNAME.SysGroupName.... I know if I did this I probably would assume that it was ServerName.SysGroupName.SYSTEMNAME.... Maybe you did too?
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ratan |
| Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245
|
I used ServerName.SystemName.SysGroupName because when you select a UPES that is the FullyQualifiedName.
Looks like I should open a PMR for this.
Thanks John.
_________________
-Ratan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| manoj |
| Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 30 Jan 2002
Posts: 237
Location: Virgina
|
Hi,
Try using the high level name of the Upes server...do not specify the fully qulaified name.. this will help u to achieve load balancing when you 've multiple systems.
eg: if ur upes defenition is UPESSVR.FMCSYS.FMCGRP.
use UPESSVR in the activity ...
_________________
-manoj |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ratan |
| Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245
|
We already do that. It helps in load balancing but there are certain scenarios where it completely screws up and that is why we are trying to specify UPES from container (different UPES for different systems).
_________________
-Ratan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sshaker |
| Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 20 Sep 2002
Posts: 185
|
Hi ratan
looking at ur message it looks like the length of the UPES name is considered along with the systema and system group name (FMC_SERVER_NAME_LENGTH) which will be more than the prescribed limit for sever name .. i guess the limit as 8 chars..
may be u will be able to cheat the system by making it just UPES name (without sys/sysgrp) as suggested by manoj .. and change it as required (with sys/sysgrp name) ... but i am not sure on how u will do that... can u explain what ur trying to achieve by using the value from container.. ?
if it doesnt work then the last option is to go to IBM with a PMR .. as u already thought of!
regards
_________________
shaker |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ratan |
| Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245
|
I got a workaround for my problem.
The Problem: I have 2 systems in my group A, B with the high level UPES name 'C' for both the systems. I need a Process that starts on System 'B' to finish on System 'B', but that doesnot happen when you have an Expired Activity in your process. When an activity expires the rest of the execution of activities moves to UPES 'c' on the Primary System.
So I need Different UPES name defined for activities in a process that starts on System A and System B.
I thought I could solve this by Specifying the fully qualified UPES name 'from container' and my first activity setting this, but evidently it did not. So I am having 2 UPESes defined per system, both pointing to the same Queue and QM. one definition will have the same name for both the Systems (this is for load balancing the first activity). Other UPES definition will be different for both systems and this will be set for rest of the UPES activities.
Thanks Guys.
_________________
-Ratan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
