| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Load Balancing or Clustering Problem! |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| Le_Quang_Hoa |
 Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 6:38 pm Post subject: Load Balancing or Clustering Problem! |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 14 May 2005
Posts: 29
Location: Viet nam
|
Dear all
I used MQServer 5.3 fixed pack 9 and all installed on Window 2003 server platform.
I have two machine A and B were configured to using Loab Balancing model.
On machine A and B, I installed two Queue Manager ( exactly same together ) called X. I want when my app put message to queue on manager X , the message will send to queue remote name Y.LCLQ on remote manager named Y was installed on machine named C
| Quote: |
on Queue Managers X (2 machine)
Transmission queue : X.TSMQ
sender channel : X.TO.Y (
TCP/IP
Connection name: 10.2.223.1
Transmission queue :X.TSMQ
Local Communicate address: 10.2.3.10
(other : 10.2.3.11)
)
REMOTE QUEUE : Y.RMTQ(
Remote queue name =Y.LCLQ
Remote queue Manager =Y
transmission queue =X.TSMQ
)
|
on Queue Manager Y
| Quote: |
Local queue Y.LCLQ
RECEIVER Channel : X.TO.Y
|
when system running. On machine A my app put a message MSG1 to queue manager X (on A ), then it stop and machine B running load balancing and put a message MSG2 to queue manager X(on B).
but message MSG2 can not send to Queue Manager Y because number of index message not sequence. it requisite reset channel.
How I can't solve problem? may i using clustering to fixing problem. if It can, how I config clustering .
Thanks
_________________
Le Quang Hoa (Mr)
Email :hoa.lequang@gmail.com
YM: hoalq98
Ha noi City - Viet Nam |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Mr Butcher |
| Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716
|
this kind of failover requires a reset channel. there is no way to get around this.
there are other (maybe better) failover solutions (mscs).
yes, clustering could be a solution, but keep in mind that clustering is not really a "failover" solution, because messages can remain unprocessed. it may only solve the "reset channel" problem. but for load balancing a mq cluster is fine.
read the "queue manager clusters" manual for mqseries cluster details.
_________________
Regards, Butcher |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
