| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| I don't want to have to create a remote q def for 10,000 ... |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| klingelb |
 Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:43 am Post subject: I don't want to have to create a remote q def for 10,000 ... |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 25 Sep 2002
Posts: 28
|
I don't want to have to create a remote q def for 10,000 MQe clients:
I have the following topology:
MQeMoon1QM <-------> MQeEarthQM <---------> MQSaturnQM
|
MQeMoon...QM<------+
|
MQeMoon10000QM<--+
I am using JMS/MQe on all my Moon Qmgrs. Earth is obviously bridge enabled. On the other side of Saturn is an MDB that pulls messages of a local q on Saturn. I have the communication working in the Moon(s)-->Saturn direction the way I like it. The problem is the communication from Saturn---->Moon(s). As it stands now I have a HomeServer Queue on each Moon Qmgr and a Store Queue on Earth Qmgr. Each Moon Qmgr programmatically adds it's Qmgr name to the destination list on the Store Queue on Earth. So I've got the Earth-->Moon(s) part of the Saturn--->Moon(s) communication routing done.
The problem I'm having now is the Saturn--->Earth part of the Saturn--->Moon(s) communication routing. It works if I create 10,000 remote q defs, one for each Moon QMgr, but I don't want to have to do this. There must be a way around this. The MDB takes the JMS replyTo field from the Moon request message and uses this to send the response back.
Any ideas how I can avoid creating 10,000 remote q defs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
This is more of an MQe question than a Java/JMS question.
And I don't know MQe well enough to answer it.
But in regular MQ, you could get around this by using MQ Clustering.
You might review the name resolution processing of MQ as well, you might be able to avoid using remote queue definitions.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| klingelb |
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 25 Sep 2002
Posts: 28
|
| Yes. I have also posted this in the MQ Everyplace forum, but this forum is much more active so I thought I'd get a quicker response. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| EddieA |
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 28 Jun 2001
Posts: 2453
Location: Los Angeles
|
| Quote: |
| but this forum is much more active so I thought I'd get a quicker response |
Probably not. But you will annoy some people by double posting.
Cheers,
_________________
Eddie Atherton
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V6.1
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V7.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
