| Author |
Message
|
| WBIMaestro |
 Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 8:08 pm Post subject: Difference between WBI MB and ICS |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 53
|
Hi All,
What really is the difference between WBI MB and ICS. What is it that i can implement with ICS that i cant with MB.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
They're both Turing complete, so there's nothing you can implement in one that you can't implement in another.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| WBIMaestro |
| Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 53
|
| by turing complete, I guess you are talking automata right...in terms of as turing machines... however, you could say that ICS allows one to integrate with apps. like SAP etc..in anon-invasive manner but WMQI/WMQ would require coding to pick the messages etc.. Am i right ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vennela |
| Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
| Those adapters (like SAP) are supposed to work with ICS and WBIMB I guess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| WBIMaestro wrote: |
| by turing complete, I guess you are talking automata right...in terms of as turing machines... however, you could say that ICS allows one to integrate with apps. like SAP etc..in anon-invasive manner but WMQI/WMQ would require coding to pick the messages etc.. Am i right ? |
ICS requires coding.
They're different products, they have different modes of operation, they have different target audiences.
And we've talked about this before. So if you are trying to do research, then you should actually research (or at least search in the first place!).
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
And if you are talking about ICS former Crossworld let me tell you that the SAP adapter was nothing but invasive. (You have to load some code in SAP to make it work). Yes it allows for better integration at a business object level, but nevertheless it is quite invasive.
I consider non invasive adapters stuff like SAP's JCO connector or Business Adapters...Stuff that is released by SAP and integrates into the product without need of further code (RFC and BAPI modules etc... are a good exemple of non invasive interfaces using SAP's JCO)
Enjoy  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
