| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Staff Assignment - Modeling Question - URGENT |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| tlaczo |
 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 6:21 am Post subject: Staff Assignment - Modeling Question - URGENT |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 41
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Hi All!
I have to implement the following staff assignment rule:
The activity should be assigned first to the process starter (one people), and after an expiration time the activity should be assigned to a role.
My idea was the following:
The activity is encapsulated in a block. The staff assignment is "Data from predefined members" The incontainer contains two members first contains the userID second the role. The Phi before the activity maps these members to ACTIVITY_INFO.Peope and ACTIVITY_INFO.MembersOfRoles. First the activity is assigned to this People. The Block has a loop data connector. The member with the userID is not in the loop connector .After expiration only the role is defined therefore the activity is assigned to the specified role.
I thought that this solution should work.
But it does not work.
I tried to initialize the Peope container with "" in the loop connector but it does not work.
Do you have any other ideas?
thanks
Tibor Laczó |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jmac |
| Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
I am not sure if you can do what you want using a single activity, I think you need a 2nd activity.
Your problem is happening because of the way the "from predefined" staffing in MQWF is done. Anytime _Activity_INFO.People is set, that is what is used. Generally, this rule has worked in my favor, because I wanted to go to a Role the first time, and a specific person on subsequent exectutions of the activity. In your case the rule is hurting you.
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| tlaczo |
| Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 41
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
thanks John!
I see now i have no other choice. I have to use a 2nd activity.
Actually i wanted to use only one activity definition because with this solution the model will have double size.
Tibor Laczó |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
