| Author |
Message
|
| kun.leeing |
 Posted: Sat May 17, 2014 2:24 am Post subject: About dump all MQ object definitions in AIX |
 |
|
Disciple
Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Posts: 171
|
Hi experts,
I remembered there is a command that we could use to output all definitions to a MQSC text. but I did forget it.
After researching on google, I found saveqmgr for windows , but what is for the Websphere MQ on Unix(AIX)
thanks in advance
Richard |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| exerk |
| Posted: Sat May 17, 2014 3:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| kun.leeing wrote: |
| ...After researching on google, I found saveqmgr for windows , but what is for the Websphere MQ on Unix(AIX)... |
The same, except that the MS03 SupportPac has been withdrawn and doesn't work on properly on WMQ versions above 7.0; it was ' replaced' by the native dmpmqcfg command, which is known to be broken and is in the process of being fixed.
Other than that you'll have to rely on piping in a list of DISPLAY commands and piping out the output, then parse the result for the information you need. If you also want the object authorities you can use the amqoamd command, but as it's undocumented there's no guarantee you'll get everything (but anecdotally, I've never known it to miss anything).
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| exerk wrote: |
| kun.leeing wrote: |
| ...After researching on google, I found saveqmgr for windows , but what is for the Websphere MQ on Unix(AIX)... |
The same, except that the MS03 SupportPac has been withdrawn and doesn't work on properly on WMQ versions above 7.0; |
It works just fine. Incompletely, but not improperly!
And it's not horrendously hard to modify the source files to include the relevant new attributes. Heck, the error messages produced will even tell you which ones are missing - albeit by numerical value. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kun.leeing |
| Posted: Mon May 19, 2014 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Posts: 171
|
Thanks guys for replying.
| Quote: |
| it was ' replaced' by the native dmpmqcfg command, which is known to be broken and is in the process of being fixed. |
does it necessarily mean that dmpmqcfg would be the proper way to dump all objects definition and what kind of problem will it arouse if I use this command for dumping. Because I will use it in production mode, I have to be careful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
Please can you tell me
(1) What issues arise if I use MS03 (version 6.1.4) against MQ 7.5 ?
I guess just any new (with MQ 7.5) attributes would not be saved?
(2) What is broken with dmpmqcfg (version 7.5.0.3)?
(3) Can I use dmpmqcfg against version 7.0.1.10 queue managers?
_________________
Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| zpat wrote: |
Please can you tell me
(1) What issues arise if I use MS03 (version 6.1.4) against MQ 7.5 ? |
It will fail to report new attributes. Well. It will throw errors indicating the PCF constants that it doesn't know about.
It may, possibly, fail to complete a full run because it failed to report some new attributes.
| zpat wrote: |
| I guess just any new (with MQ 7.5) attributes would not be saved? |
Pretty much.
It's not *conceptually* difficult to go through the various queue.c, etc files in the MS03 source code, and add new entries for each of the new attributes.
But it's rather a slog. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
