Author |
Message
|
harsha8127 |
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 25 Nov 2013 Posts: 72
|
no i have completely stopped with command stop chl(qm1.qm2) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
exerk |
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 6339
|
A stopped channel stays stopped until operator action to either restart it or set it's state to INACTIVE is initiated. Set the state to INACTIVE and then check whether triggering is working or not. _________________ It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
harsha8127 |
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 25 Nov 2013 Posts: 72
|
how to inactive the channel..
is there any command for bringing the channel to inactive state.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
exerk |
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 6339
|
harsha8127 wrote: |
...
is there any command for bringing the channel to inactive state... |
Yes, there is. You need to read more of the Info Centre. And remember, it is searchable. _________________ It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
harsha8127 |
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 25 Nov 2013 Posts: 72
|
could any one help me in bringing the channel to inactive state...
how to bring the channel to inactive state to applying triggering.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
exerk |
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 6339
|
Read my previous post - you do know what a hyper-link is don't you? _________________ It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PaulClarke |
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 17 Nov 2005 Posts: 1002 Location: New Zealand
|
If you manually stop a channel then the channel will remain stopped until you manually start it again. Imagine the scenario where you wanted to stop your channels to do some maintenance or change your network settings or whatever. Would it not be hugely annoying if every time you stopped your channels they immediately re-triggered and started again ? For this reason a STOPPPED channel will not trigger.
So, you either have to stop your channel with the INACTIVE setting or just let your channels die 'naturally'. The simplest way to do this is set a disconnect interval of just a few seconds and don't send a message down the channel. Once the channel has ended then put a message and you'll see the channel bounce up again.
Cheers,
Paul. _________________ Paul Clarke
MQGem Software
www.mqgem.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
harsha8127 |
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 25 Nov 2013 Posts: 72
|
thanks for everyone who helped me got the output...QQQ  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JosephGramig |
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 1244 Location: Gold Coast of Florida, USA
|
harsha8127,
If you did modify the DISCINT, be kind to those who follow you and set it back to the default of 6000 (or something reasonable like 1800 (30 minutes)). Only in exceptional conditions do I find it necessary to change the DISCINT to (normally) larger value like days. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
harsha8127 |
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 2:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 25 Nov 2013 Posts: 72
|
dear folks
I came across many mq blogs and even in ibm mq infocenter that a 'process' would require for channel triggering which comprises of a 'processid and applicid and userdata' but while iam implementing that scenario as channel trigger would follow my process in my windows machine(local).
its not working so far(channel triggering is working without defining a process in local machine).
Is that necessary to define a process for channel triggering in any other scenario rather than in local machine.
thanks in advance for help.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zpat |
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001 Posts: 5866 Location: UK
|
As we keep telling you - you don't need a process definition. You don't need trigger data.
Check everything is correct; trigger on, trigger first, correct init queue, correct xmit queue in the channel definition etc.
What version of MQ do you have? _________________ Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
exerk |
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 6339
|
harsha8127 wrote: |
...Is that necessary to define a process for channel triggering... |
NO! LOOK AT THIS! _________________ It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|