Author |
Message
|
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
smdavies99 wrote: |
Seriously, if the OP does not even have access to a dev machine without involving admins then I have to wonder what sort of site he's working on. |
Quite. As I've attempted to make clear, my comments do not extend to a dev environment (local or otherwise). _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
chirasukham wrote: |
I was just yanking a chain.. |
Welcome to the forum; enjoy your stay.
 _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chirasukham |
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 07 May 2013 Posts: 19
|
Vitor wrote: |
chirasukham wrote: |
I was just yanking a chain.. |
Welcome to the forum; enjoy your stay.
 |
Thanks.
(note to self : Add Hursley to Bucket List of Destinations to be visited.)
   |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
chirasukham wrote: |
(note to self : Add Hursley to Bucket List of Destinations to be visited.) |
Be sure to see the museum & tell everyone I said hi. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chirasukham |
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 07 May 2013 Posts: 19
|
OK, I've resolved some issues and now I'm stuck with this issue.
I think once I get past this one, I should have a working flow.
I have the following xsd, and I'm trying to create a new message definition file ( .mxsd ? ) using this XSD.
Code: |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="unqualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified"
targetNamespace="http://xml.bcbsfl.com/providerservices/PIP2DMD"
xmlns:p2d="http://xml.bcbsfl.com/providerservices/PIP2DMD"
version="1.0" >
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
2013-08-27j: initial generation
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:include schemaLocation="CommonTypes.xsd"/>
<xs:complexType name="ProvServiceType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" name="MedicalProgram" type="p2d:MedicalProgramType"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="MedicalProgramType">
<xs:attribute name="MedProgCode" type="p2d:String12" use="optional"/>
<xs:attribute name="SubProgCode" type="p2d:String12" use="optional"/>
<xs:attribute name="BdtcPdfValue" type="p2d:String12" use="optional"/>
<xs:attribute name="EffectiveDate" type="p2d:String12" use="optional"/>
<xs:attribute name="TermDate" type="p2d:String12" use="optional"/>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
|
It's generating the following sets of errors.
No finagling on my part seems to get rid of the "Message Set Cannot contain two global element declarations" error.
Code: |
A Message Set can not contain two global element declarations with the same name and namespace (target or chameleon): '#MedicalProgram' ProvService.mxsd pip_dmd_msg_set/PIP_DMD line 44 Cached Message Set Core Validation Problem
A Message Set can not contain two global type definitions with the same name and namespace (target or chameleon): '#MedicalProgramType' ProvService.mxsd pip_dmd_msg_set/PIP_DMD line 45 Cached Message Set Core Validation Problem
A Message Set can not contain two global type definitions with the same name and namespace (target or chameleon): '#ProvServiceType' ProvService.mxsd pip_dmd_msg_set/PIP_DMD line 46 Cached Message Set Core Validation Problem
Duplicate XML name for global elements 'MedicalProgram', 'MedicalProgram'. Physical format: 'XML'. ProvService.mxsd pip_dmd_msg_set/PIP_DMD line 47 Cached Message Set Core Validation Problem
|
How can I resolve this issue ? I followed some APAR instructions from the IBM site, to try and do "Source"-> "Cleanup Document" after importing it into the work space, but to no avail.
Please help!.
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kimbert |
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 29 Jul 2003 Posts: 5542 Location: Southampton
|
Is this a completely different problem? If so, you should really open a new thread.
The key question for me is 'why are you creating a new message set that contains an XML physical format?'. _________________ Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way you're a mile away, and you have their shoes too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chirasukham |
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 2:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 07 May 2013 Posts: 19
|
If I understand correctly, this is not a new message set. Its part of a message set. (Message flow definition ?). ALso, I am not sure where the XSD says that I am creating an XML physical format. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smdavies99 |
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 2:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003 Posts: 6076 Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
I think Kimbert was referring to this
Quote: |
Duplicate XML name for global elements 'MedicalProgram', 'MedicalProgram'. Physical format: 'XML'. ProvService.mxsd pip_dmd_msg_set/PIP_DMD line 47 Cached Message Set Core Validation Problem
|
Physical format: 'XML' _________________ WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lancelotlinc |
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 22 Mar 2010 Posts: 4941 Location: Bloomington, IL USA
|
chirasukham wrote: |
I was just yanking a chain.. If I understand correctly, this is not a new message set. Its part of a message set. (Message flow definition ?). ALso, I am not sure where the XSD says that I am creating an XML physical format. |
Then you should not be yanking peoples' chain and rather find some place to acquire the proper knowledge other than on this forum.
Participants of the forum expect you to come prepared. You seem unprepared and have not accomplished the due diligence expected of you. _________________ http://leanpub.com/IIB_Tips_and_Tricks
Save $20: Coupon Code: MQSERIES_READER |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chirasukham |
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 07 May 2013 Posts: 19
|
OK, I stand duly admonished.
Apologies.
This does not even appear to be an XSD import issue.
I will create a new thread with another approach to the issue I am facing.
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kimbert |
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 29 Jul 2003 Posts: 5542 Location: Southampton
|
Quote: |
I am not sure where the XSD says that I am creating an XML physical format. |
The XSD doesn't explicitly say so, unless you know where to look. Physical formats ( XML or otherwise ) are added to a message set, and apply to all message definitions in the message set.
Quote: |
If I understand correctly, this is not a new message set. Its part of a message set. |
Right - but your overall task appears to be a new message flow, with a new message set. If so, you should be using XMLNSC, not MRM. XMLNSC does not require the XML physical format, and will not use it even if it happens to be present in the message set. _________________ Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way you're a mile away, and you have their shoes too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
lancelotlinc wrote: |
Then you should not be yanking peoples' chain and rather find some place to acquire the proper knowledge other than on this forum.
Participants of the forum expect you to come prepared. You seem unprepared and have not accomplished the due diligence expected of you. |
A little grumpy this morning are we? Did Siri tell you to get your own contact admin coffee?
 _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lancelotlinc |
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 22 Mar 2010 Posts: 4941 Location: Bloomington, IL USA
|
Vitor wrote: |
lancelotlinc wrote: |
Then you should not be yanking peoples' chain and rather find some place to acquire the proper knowledge other than on this forum.
Participants of the forum expect you to come prepared. You seem unprepared and have not accomplished the due diligence expected of you. |
A little grumpy this morning are we? Did Siri tell you to get your own contact admin coffee?
 |
No, but here is how I implemented the coffee :
1. Bought an Intel NUC.
2. Installed IIB on NUC.
3. Installed WeMo.
4. Created message flow EmailInput -> Compute -> HttpRequest. _________________ http://leanpub.com/IIB_Tips_and_Tricks
Save $20: Coupon Code: MQSERIES_READER |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
You need to use RFC 1149 to transport coffee. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
lancelotlinc wrote: |
Vitor wrote: |
lancelotlinc wrote: |
Then you should not be yanking peoples' chain and rather find some place to acquire the proper knowledge other than on this forum.
Participants of the forum expect you to come prepared. You seem unprepared and have not accomplished the due diligence expected of you. |
A little grumpy this morning are we? Did Siri tell you to get your own contact admin coffee?
 |
No, but here is how I implemented the coffee :
1. Bought an Intel NUC.
2. Installed IIB on NUC.
3. Installed WeMo.
4. Created message flow EmailInput -> Compute -> HttpRequest. |
I use a Keurig kept constantly on standby. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|