|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
 |
|
How to solve a "Channel 'XXX' not found problem" |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
khewuwei |
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:44 pm Post subject: How to solve a "Channel 'XXX' not found problem" |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 9
|
Hi everyone,
I am trying to establish a test connection between two different queue managers but I cant.
I have two different queue manager on two different machine:
1) LOCAL_QM on my local machine
2) VM_QM on the 2003 Server Enterprise Edition on VMWare.
LOCAL_QM has these queues & Channels:
-> FROM.VM (local queue)
-> TO.VM (transmission queue)
-> REMOTE.TO.VM (remote queue)
-> SEND.TO.VM (sender channel)
-> RECEIVE.FROM.VM (receiver channel)
VM_QM has these queues & channel:
-> FROM.LOCAL (local queue)
-> TO.LOCAL (transmission queue)
-> REMOTE.TO.LOCAL (remote queue)
-> SEND.TO.LOCAL (sender channel)
-> RECEIVE.FROM.LOCAL (receiver channel)
both machine are able to ping and telnet each other's port. The listeners for both QMs are also up and running
However, when i click on the sender channel of VM_QM , and 'Start', There will be a message: "The request to start the channel was accepted (AMQ4008)" but the overall channel status will remain as "retrying". After looking at the event viewer, there will be a error msg (ID: 9520):
"Channel not defined remotely
There is no definition of channel 'SEND.TO.LOCAL' at the remote location
Add an appropriate definition to the remote hosts list of defined channels and retry the operation."
After that, when i click on the sender channel of LOCAL_QM , and 'Start', There will be a message: "The request to start the channel was accepted (AMQ4008)" but the overall channel status will start as "Initializing" and then "retrying". The error log will appear on the the VM machine and the message is (ID: 9519):
"Channel SEND.TO.VM not found.
The requested operation failed because the program could not find a definition of channel SEND.TO.VM
Check that the name is specified correctly and the channel definition is available"
Is there anything wrong with the configuration of the VM_QM?
Thank you guys in advance! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr Butcher |
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005 Posts: 1716
|
yes,, channel names have to match between sender and receiver.
if you define SENDER(SEND.TO.VM) on LOCAL_QM, you have to define RECEIVER(SEND.TO.VM) on the VM_QM.
check the intercommunication guide.
for channel names, it is sometimes better to name them FROMQMGR.TO.TOQMGR or similair (of course there are many naming conventions). in your case LOCALQM.TO.VMQM (which will be fine for both queuemanagers if you look at the channel) _________________ Regards, Butcher |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khewuwei |
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 9
|
Thanks a million!!
I didnt even realized such a stupid mistake!!!
Thanks once again! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|