ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » COD, COA & DLQ

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 COD, COA & DLQ « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
carolhara
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:34 am    Post subject: COD, COA & DLQ Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 56

What I´m trying to do is very simple: send a message from a QM to another getting cod and coa messages.
I get cod and coa messages but the message I´m sending ends up in the dead letter queue.
The names of the queues are correct... everything seems to be ok so what could be wrong?

Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bower5932
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 27 Aug 2001
Posts: 3023
Location: Dallas, TX, USA

Did you check the reason code of the message on the DLQ to see why it got put there?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
carolhara
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 56

Yes. 2087 unknown remote queue manager that asks me to check the names of the objects.
They´re fine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

So, it's telling you that it can't find the queue manager.

I.e., the route to the destination qmgr where the COA/CODs should be delivered. I.e., the ReplyToQmgr on the original message.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

jefflowrey wrote:
So, it's telling you that it can't find the queue manager.

I.e., the DEFAULT route to the destination qmgr where the COA/CODs should be delivered. I.e., the ReplyToQmgr on the original message.


@ carolhara
For more information about routing and default routes check the intercommunications manual
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bruce2359
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guest




Quote:
Yes. 2087 unknown remote queue manager that asks me to check the names of the objects. They´re fine.


What this means is that the message you sent arrived on a queue manager that was not the one specified in the transmission queue header.

Take a look at your remote queue definition (DEFINE QR) on the sending queue manager. The Remote Queue Manager Name (RQMNAME) field must exactly match the name of the queue manager on the receiving side. Remember, object names in MQ are case-sensitive.
Back to top
carolhara
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 56

The manual sugests the name of the transmission queue to be the same as the queue manager. That´s what I did and now it´s working!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

carolhara wrote:
The manual sugests the name of the transmission queue to be the same as the queue manager. That´s what I did and now it´s working!


The manual suggests the need for a default route to the replyto queue manager.

One of the ways to do that is to have the xmitq have the same name as the qmgr.

The other way is to have a qmgr alias setup. (See intercommunications manual -- multihop & qmgr alias)


_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bruce2359
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guest




ReplyToQueue and ReplyToQueueManager names must be resolved on the requesting (sending) queue manager; AND the ReplyToQueueManager name must match the transmission queue name of the replying queue manager.
Back to top
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

Bruce,

You mean it is not enough if the replyto QMGR is resolved through a qmgr Alias??
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bruce2359
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guest




Quote:
You mean it is not enough if the replyto QMGR is resolved through a qmgr Alias??


A definition on the sending side must exist to successfully resolve both names or the MQPUT will fail. A qmgr alias satisfies this requirement.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » COD, COA & DLQ
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.