| Author |
Message
|
| sanu_mit |
 Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:01 am Post subject: WMB required to capture messages from a very low band-width |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 25
Location: Kolkata
|
Hi,
I have tried a search to this site but could not reach at a desired response. Would be obliged if someone kindly refer me the link.
My situation goes like this: I shall be using WMB 6.x to capture messages from a distant source which shall be connecting to my box through some protocol of very low band-width (like dial-up or Radio Frequency or the like).
What I would like to know here is any clue or reference to standards to establish the connectivity with WMB (like using MQInput, HTTPInput, etc) so that the availability can be optimised.
Expecting some suggestions from you.
Thanks in anticipation.
Sanu Mit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:07 am Post subject: Re: WMB required to capture messages from a very low band-wi |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| sanu_mit wrote: |
My situation goes like this: I shall be using WMB 6.x to capture messages from a distant source which shall be connecting to my box through some protocol of very low band-width (like dial-up or Radio Frequency or the like).
|
Accepting that, what protocol and/or format will the messages be sent in? What I mean is you can run TCP/IP over both of the technologies you mention (albeit slowly!) so in theory could use either http or MQe to transfer the messages.
What have you selected? Will this not have a greater impact on availability than the broker? Or am I missing something?
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sanu_mit |
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 25
Location: Kolkata
|
Hi Vitor,
The concerns that you have are my concerns too. I am looking for some suggestions and/or advice as to how such a given situation be addressed.
Regards,
Sanu Mit |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| sanu_mit wrote: |
The concerns that you have are my concerns too. I am looking for some suggestions and/or advice as to how such a given situation be addressed.
|
But then this isn't strictly a problem with MQ or broker; you're restricted by the underlying architecture. Aside from the obvious point that MQe is more reliable than HTTP I'm not sure what else can be said.
But with luck someone else will think of something! 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vmcgloin |
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 04 Apr 2002
Posts: 560
Location: Scotland
|
| I have never used it myself, but you could also look into WebSphere MQ Telemetry Transport and SCADA nodes, if you are designing the system from scratch. But it really depends on the devices you are connecting... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
Broker offers a bunch of choices for transports.
You need to know more than you've told us to decide which is best.
Start with finding out what the remote end can use. Can it run a qmgr? can it run an MQClient? Can it run JMS/XMS? Does it need to use plain TCP/IP?
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| JLRowe |
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yatiri
Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 664
Location: South East London
|
| vmcgloin wrote: |
| I have never used it myself, but you could also look into WebSphere MQ Telemetry Transport and SCADA nodes, if you are designing the system from scratch. But it really depends on the devices you are connecting... |
SCADA was specifically designed for low bandwidth clients with low processing power. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| JLRowe wrote: |
| vmcgloin wrote: |
| I have never used it myself, but you could also look into WebSphere MQ Telemetry Transport and SCADA nodes, if you are designing the system from scratch. But it really depends on the devices you are connecting... |
SCADA was specifically designed for low bandwidth clients with low processing power. |
How about ELF @ Mil norm? 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
