| Author |
Message |
 Topic: 2085 for an existing queue, again !!!!! |
varmamvn
Replies: 12
Views: 9028
|
 Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Sat May 18, 2002 4:32 am Subject: 2085 for an existing queue, again !!!!! |
Thanks everyone for trying to solve this problem,
I gave up. I have merged both the 2 QMs into one. I think this is a bug with Weblogic and MQSeries. If you have two different QM's put under one ap ... |
| Topic: Should I use JAVA or JMS? |
varmamvn
Replies: 25
Views: 26970
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Sat May 18, 2002 4:25 am Subject: Should I use JAVA or JMS? |
Murugan,
You are the man! You always try to help me.
Well, regarding the Correlation ID problem in JMS. I always seem to be getting 0's in my Correlation ID.
I have also observed the followin ... |
| Topic: Should I use JAVA or JMS? |
varmamvn
Replies: 25
Views: 26970
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Sat May 18, 2002 4:18 am Subject: Should I use JAVA or JMS? |
Peter,
MDB's run under the application server's control and thus have many fancy features like pooling, transaction support, etc.... Whereas, in Base Java processes we need to struggle to implement ... |
| Topic: Should I use JAVA or JMS? |
varmamvn
Replies: 25
Views: 26970
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Thu May 16, 2002 5:49 pm Subject: Should I use JAVA or JMS? |
Hi Peter,
JMS is definately a very attractive solution, since once you map the Queues and QMs into JNDI, you can always access it from anywhere. This is a major plus over Base Java, where it would ... |
| Topic: MQSeries Certification |
varmamvn
Replies: 5
Views: 4132
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Thu May 16, 2002 1:16 am Subject: Mq Series certification |
the link is broken. Does anybody know where to get info about IBM MQ series certification?
Thanks in advacne
Varma |
| Topic: 2085 for an existing queue, again !!!!! |
varmamvn
Replies: 12
Views: 9028
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed May 15, 2002 10:47 pm Subject: 2085 for an existing queue, again !!!!! |
Hi Murugan,
My Java programs are stand alone classes which are running inside the Weblogic app server. The Queue managers are different and their listener ports are different but both their sender ... |
| Topic: 2085 for an existing queue, again !!!!! |
varmamvn
Replies: 12
Views: 9028
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed May 15, 2002 6:07 pm Subject: 2085 |
Murugan,
Thanks for your interest. I do not think that it is to do with the number of processes. We are usually just testing with one process for QM1 and one for QM2.
I took the trace on QM1 by ... |
| Topic: 2085 for an existing queue, again !!!!! |
varmamvn
Replies: 12
Views: 9028
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Tue May 14, 2002 5:04 pm Subject: 2085 for an existing queue, again !!!!! |
hi jeff,
no it is not possible for the application to get the wrong queue name, as I can see in my logs the Q manager and the Q name that the application is trying to access. They show the right na ... |
| Topic: 2085 for an existing queue, again !!!!! |
varmamvn
Replies: 12
Views: 9028
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Mon May 13, 2002 9:50 pm Subject: 2085 for a valid queue |
Hi all,
I just came to know that this problem has more complicated roots. Basically, I have my Queue manager Q1 along with another Queue manager Q2 on Sun Solaris. Both the remote queue definitions ... |
| Topic: 2085 for an existing queue, again !!!!! |
varmamvn
Replies: 12
Views: 9028
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Mon May 13, 2002 5:57 pm Subject: Re: 2085 problem! |
Hi Kolban,
Thanks for offering to help. This is the setup information. There is no clustering involved. The remote Q is on the IBM Mainframe. The remote Q manager serves many remote MQ servers on t ... |
| Topic: 2085 for an existing queue, again !!!!! |
varmamvn
Replies: 12
Views: 9028
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Mon May 13, 2002 8:51 am Subject: 2085 for an existing queue, again !!!!! |
Hi all,
I desperately need your expertise in solving my problem that I am facing in MQ-Series. I have MQ-Series 5.2 installed and configured on a Sun Solaris machine. It was giving occassional err ... |
| Topic: 2085 for already defined Queue !!!! |
varmamvn
Replies: 2
Views: 3040
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Thu May 09, 2002 5:20 pm Subject: 2085 for already defined Queue !!!! |
Murugan,
Thanks for offering help. You will be surprised to know that it started working this morning. I really did not change anything. The end is as weird as the beginning!
Thanks
Varma |
| Topic: 2085 for already defined Queue!!! |
varmamvn
Replies: 3
Views: 3837
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu May 09, 2002 5:19 pm Subject: 2085 for already defined Queue!!! |
Murugan,
Thanks for offering help. You will be surprised to know that it started working this morning. I really did not change anything. The end is as weird as the beginning!
Thanks
Varma |
| Topic: 2085 for already defined Queue !!!! |
varmamvn
Replies: 2
Views: 3040
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Thu May 09, 2002 4:08 am Subject: 2085 for already defined Queue !!!! |
Hi all,
I have this strange problem that is driving me nuts. I have a remote Queue defined, which I'm trying to put messages using Java native binding. Environment is Sun Solaris. I get the error C ... |
| Topic: 2085 for already defined Queue!!! |
varmamvn
Replies: 3
Views: 3837
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu May 09, 2002 4:07 am Subject: 2085 for already defined Queue!!! |
Hi all,
I have this strange problem that is driving me nuts. I have a remote Queue defined, which I'm trying to put messages using Java native binding. Environment is Sun Solaris. I get the error C ... |
