| Author |
Message |
 Topic: MQ Response message has garbled characters for spaces |
starki78
Replies: 4
Views: 3780
|
 Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:30 am Subject: MQ Response message has garbled characters for spaces |
thanks for your feedback.
I did not recognize this error, however it makes no difference in the reported testresults |
| Topic: MQ Response message has garbled characters for spaces |
starki78
Replies: 4
Views: 3780
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:47 am Subject: MQ Response message has garbled characters for spaces |
Hello,
We have the following issue and I hope that someone has a great idea:-)
When using the following Code we get the Correct-Resonse as below:
gmo.options = MQC.MQGMO_NO_SYNCPOINT; // Set ... |
| Topic: Generating Binary Correlation-ID from BigInteger not working |
starki78
Replies: 5
Views: 4236
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:25 am Subject: Generating Binary Correlation-ID from BigInteger not working |
I reviewed them several times
over and over.
Sorry I think my question is very clear
but maybe wrong
bye |
| Topic: Generating Binary Correlation-ID from BigInteger not working |
starki78
Replies: 5
Views: 4236
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:06 am Subject: Generating Binary Correlation-ID from BigInteger not working |
thanks for your feedback.
We are non using WebSphere on the Client-Side but Java and need to implement this manually.
We have a Request-Response sceario
Java--->MQ-Request-Queue-->Custom ... |
| Topic: Generating Binary Correlation-ID from BigInteger not working |
starki78
Replies: 5
Views: 4236
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 4:17 am Subject: Generating Binary Correlation-ID from BigInteger not working |
Hello,
We found out that we can make a successful Correlation with our Business partner (MQ-Series 6) if we set the Correlation-ID
this way:
String corrid = "EDE12333345555"
// ... |
| Topic: In which cases Correlation-ID needs to be in binary format? |
starki78
Replies: 12
Views: 6162
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:59 am Subject: In which cases Correlation-ID needs to be in binary format? |
I finally got the Stacktrace from MQ-Side:
Does anybody have a MQ-sample which could reproduce this error below?
SystemErr R java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "2asa ... |
| Topic: In which cases Correlation-ID needs to be in binary format? |
starki78
Replies: 12
Views: 6162
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:18 am Subject: In which cases Correlation-ID needs to be in binary format? |
thanks for your feedback.
I do not understand this:
This should be enough. However consider the case where you need to populate with getJMSMessageID(), because the correlation id is a byte array ... |
| Topic: In which cases Correlation-ID needs to be in binary format? |
starki78
Replies: 12
Views: 6162
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:20 am Subject: In which cases Correlation-ID needs to be in binary format? |
the code is from the sender application.
I've no control on the MQ-Series side.
Not working means that the Response-Message cannot be correlated to the Request Message if I don't set the Correlati ... |
| Topic: In which cases Correlation-ID needs to be in binary format? |
starki78
Replies: 12
Views: 6162
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:33 am Subject: In which cases Correlation-ID needs to be in binary format? |
it's a classical request response scenario.
byte byteArray[] = xmlString.getBytes();
outMessage.correlationId = byteArray;
outMessage.replyToQueueName = sResponseQueueName;
outMessage.writ ... |
| Topic: In which cases Correlation-ID needs to be in binary format? |
starki78
Replies: 12
Views: 6162
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:56 am Subject: In which cases Correlation-ID needs to be in binary format? |
thanks for your reply.
In my situation we send the Correlation ID
as a HEX-String.
But it is not interpreted correctly on MQ-Side.
Hence is the correct solution of this is that we must
gener ... |
| Topic: In which cases Correlation-ID needs to be in binary format? |
starki78
Replies: 12
Views: 6162
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:23 am Subject: In which cases Correlation-ID needs to be in binary format? |
Hello,
from time to time we step about the usecase
that a Correlation-ID scenarios works only when the
Correlation-ID is in binary.
In this scenarios the message gets sent to MQ-request queue ... |
| Topic: How to convert 1141 EBEDIC to ISO8859-15 (923) |
starki78
Replies: 10
Views: 9689
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 5:36 am Subject: How to convert 1141 EBEDIC to ISO8859-15 (923) |
thanks for the response.
Are you saying that you recommend to convert first
to 1208 (UTF) and then it is possible to convert to the desired CCSID?
If this is the case is there any chance to con ... |
| Topic: How to convert 1141 EBEDIC to ISO8859-15 (923) |
starki78
Replies: 10
Views: 9689
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 12:24 am Subject: How to convert 1141 EBEDIC to ISO8859-15 (923) |
Hello
I've learnt that when converting between ASCII and EBEDIC
the right thing to do is to look at the convesation table
shipped with the MQ-Series installation.
Further MQC.MQGMO_CONVERT ne ... |
| Topic: Message is not remaining in Backout requeue queue |
starki78
Replies: 8
Views: 5102
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 2:29 am Subject: Message is not remaining in Backout requeue queue |
this is correct.
I've verified this right now. Only after a new message can be processed successfully the bad messages remain permanently in the error-queue.
Thank you very much
 |
| Topic: Message is not remaining in Backout requeue queue |
starki78
Replies: 8
Views: 5102
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Sat May 07, 2011 7:52 am Subject: Message is not remaining in Backout requeue queue |
Regarding:
You say that with WebLogicJMS no 'new' message will be created, i.e. the backed-out-and-requeued message, but are you absolutely sure that what I have described above is not going on under ... |
