| Author |
Message |
 Topic: MQ Error logs DATE format difference AIX vs Linux |
smeunier
Replies: 1
Views: 6237
|
 Forum: General Discussion Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:36 am Subject: MQ Error logs DATE format difference AIX vs Linux |
| I was writing a script the other day which would interrogate for certain MQ Errors in the AMQERR0x.LOG files. I originally wrote it on AIX (bash) and ported it over to Linux (bash). I was getting odd ... |
| Topic: Multi Instance Fail over does not occur if NFS Unmounted |
smeunier
Replies: 4
Views: 6771
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:40 am Subject: Multi Instance Fail over does not occur if NFS Unmounted |
Did you try and generate any traffic?
We repeated the test and then tried some connectivity, without messages. This then cause the active Queue Manager to fail, generating some FDC files. So I get ... |
| Topic: Multi Instance Fail over does not occur if NFS Unmounted |
smeunier
Replies: 4
Views: 6771
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:19 am Subject: Re: Multi Instance Fail over does not occur if NFS Unmounted |
Where did you look for errors?
I looked in /var/mqm/errors and in the MQ error logs for for the Queue Manager which were NFS mounted, but obviously could not be written to. |
| Topic: Multi Instance Fail over does not occur if NFS Unmounted |
smeunier
Replies: 4
Views: 6771
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2020 1:08 pm Subject: Multi Instance Fail over does not occur if NFS Unmounted |
Environment: Linux Redhat V7.8
MQ Version: 9.1.0.5
NFS netapp V4
Scenario:
We have had the Multi-Instance configuration set for quite a while now and have run many different failover scenari ... |
| Topic: SSL issue: AMQ9642E: No SSL or TLS certificate for channel |
smeunier
Replies: 7
Views: 11450
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2019 1:30 pm Subject: SSL issue: AMQ9642E: No SSL or TLS certificate for channel |
How about on the "DIS QMGR CERTLABL" command. Do you see it set there, as well?
Yes, when I issue the command, it is specified. in the QMGR CERTLABL. It is added by default. It was only o ... |
| Topic: SSL issue: AMQ9642E: No SSL or TLS certificate for channel |
smeunier
Replies: 7
Views: 11450
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:07 am Subject: SSL issue: AMQ9642E: No SSL or TLS certificate for channel |
What label name is specified in the channel definition?
The label name is: ibmwebspheremqefk300tst That certificate by that label does exist in the key.kdb. I can list the details on it by that ... |
| Topic: SSL issue: AMQ9642E: No SSL or TLS certificate for channel |
smeunier
Replies: 7
Views: 11450
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:12 am Subject: SSL issue: AMQ9642E: No SSL or TLS certificate for channel |
A little back story:
We just upgraded from MQ Version 7.5 to MQ V9.1.0.3 on AIX. We single install and just did dmpmqcfg saved the object and install the V9.1.0.3 version. Installation went well, a ... |
| Topic: Managed subscriptions |
smeunier
Replies: 2
Views: 4087
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:34 am Subject: Managed subscriptions |
| We recently moved from V6 MQ to V9.1 MQ servers. Most application clients are still using MQ V5.3, V6 or V7.5 client libraries and use CHAR wildcards. To mitigate change, without having to redo all a ... |
| Topic: MQ Internal Broker V6 to V9 coeexistence |
smeunier
Replies: 22
Views: 21060
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2019 5:09 am Subject: MQ Internal Broker V6 to V9 coeexistence |
| Am unsure about the context you are referring to in the above snippets of your more recent post. You mention "broker" several times here. What are you referring to as a "broker"?
... |
| Topic: MQ Internal Broker V6 to V9 coeexistence |
smeunier
Replies: 22
Views: 21060
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:20 am Subject: MQ Internal Broker V6 to V9 coeexistence |
the OP was trying to achieve by clustering the SYSTEM.BROKER.CONTROL.QUEUE?
The intention of the single broker was for simplicity. The gateways were to offload client connectivity and distribute t ... |
| Topic: MQ Internal Broker V6 to V9 coeexistence |
smeunier
Replies: 22
Views: 21060
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:14 am Subject: MQ Internal Broker V6 to V9 coeexistence |
 Shame on me for not thinking about the QREMOTE path!
Initial test show that Defining the SYSTEM.BROKER.CONTROL.QUEUE, SYSTEM.BROKER.ADMIN.STREAM and SYSTEM.BROKER.DEFAULT.STREAM Queues as r ... |
| Topic: MQ Internal Broker V6 to V9 coeexistence |
smeunier
Replies: 22
Views: 21060
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2019 10:44 am Subject: MQ Internal Broker V6 to V9 coeexistence |
| In our old V6 environment, there was a single Qmgr running a broker. There were two gateway Qmgrs that shared the broker via clustering of the SYSTEM.BROKER.CONTROL.QUEUE, SYSTEM.BROKER.ADMIN.STREAM a ... |
| Topic: MQ Internal Broker V6 to V9 coeexistence |
smeunier
Replies: 22
Views: 21060
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2019 7:55 am Subject: MQ Internal Broker V6 to V9 coeexistence |
Forgot to include the exception
MAIN:ClientCollection.initialized():com.ibm.btv.clientfw.ClientCollectionException: com.ibm.btv.mqclient.MQJMSTopicsClientException: initiali ... |
| Topic: MQ Internal Broker V6 to V9 coeexistence |
smeunier
Replies: 22
Views: 21060
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2019 7:43 am Subject: MQ Internal Broker V6 to V9 coeexistence |
Hoping this gets seen.......
So finally we have built V9.1 Queue Managers on AIX. I have run Pub/Sub verification tests and have tested also with generic application. This works.
Rather than do ... |
| Topic: V6 Migration to V9.1 question(s) |
smeunier
Replies: 4
Views: 11207
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 12:24 pm Subject: V6 Migration to V9.1 question(s) |
New hardware with a new OS? Just install MQ 9.1.0.2 clean
Well, I thought of that and agree with you, except right now, that new hardware in reality has been downgraded to match the current environ ... |
