| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| Search found 4 matches |
| Author |
Message |
 Topic: really a basic question, JMS vs. base Java classes |
siqi
Replies: 12
Views: 7127
|
 Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2004 7:15 am Subject: really a basic question, JMS vs. base Java classes |
The only thing your other applications - C, C++, plain Java, COBOL, VB, .NET, etc. - will care about is the CONTENTS of the message.
How you choose to populate those contents is up to you.
It is ... |
| Topic: really a basic question, JMS vs. base Java classes |
siqi
Replies: 12
Views: 7127
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2004 7:06 am Subject: really a basic question, JMS vs. base Java classes |
3) Any time you say preferred, I'd have to say 'it depends'. I'm not sure that I know enough about what you are doing to say there is a clear-cut answer.
I think what I want to know is wehther ... |
| Topic: really a basic question, JMS vs. base Java classes |
siqi
Replies: 12
Views: 7127
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:44 am Subject: really a basic question, JMS vs. base Java classes |
3) Any time you say preferred, I'd have to say 'it depends'. I'm not sure that I know enough about what you are doing to say there is a clear-cut answer.
I think what I want to know is wehther ... |
| Topic: really a basic question, JMS vs. base Java classes |
siqi
Replies: 12
Views: 7127
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:02 am Subject: really a basic question, JMS vs. base Java classes |
I have programed with JMS on SonicMQ. Now I am start working with
MQSeries. I kind of got confused with basic concept.
So please advice me whether the following is correct:
1) MQI is a low leve ... |
|
|
|
