| Author |
Message |
 Topic: MQ MFT Filelogger timestamp - UTC/BST |
sealpup
Replies: 1
Views: 5061
|
 Forum: IBM MQ File Transfer Edition Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:04 am Subject: MQ MFT Filelogger timestamp - UTC/BST |
MQ MFT 7.5.0.2
MQ 7.5.0.2
We have an MQ/MFT Filelogger which is interrogated by various scripting programs for audit/reporting etc.
The recent advent of daylight saving time has caused an issue, ... |
| Topic: HTTP request failing with 'SSLException: bad record MAC' |
sealpup
Replies: 4
Views: 3842
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:34 am Subject: HTTP request failing with 'SSLException: bad record MAC' |
| The effect of your suggestion would be unknown, as, I repeat, I have no visibility of the Web service infrastructure. Unfortunately I have no environment to test this in other than Production which is ... |
| Topic: HTTP request failing with 'SSLException: bad record MAC' |
sealpup
Replies: 4
Views: 3842
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:59 am Subject: HTTP request failing with 'SSLException: bad record MAC' |
And I had read that blog before I posted.
His work/findings are entirely based on Java, not Broker, and are hardly definitive. Full of caveats, ifs, buts and maybes.
It's apparent that this is not ... |
| Topic: HTTP request failing with 'SSLException: bad record MAC' |
sealpup
Replies: 4
Views: 3842
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:05 am Subject: HTTP request failing with 'SSLException: bad record MAC' |
Greetings from the Atlantic Ocean.
HTTP request node hitting the failure terminal.
Trace as below.
I have googled this error - Error Text: 'javax.net.ssl.SSLException: bad record MAC' - withou ... |
| Topic: deploying flows with WMB v 8.0.0.2 - copying filesystem? |
sealpup
Replies: 14
Views: 7427
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 5:03 am Subject: deploying flows with WMB v 8.0.0.2 - copying filesystem? |
Well, we had never actually embarked on this strategy as some of you seem to think.
I was merely sounding out the feasabiity of our idea.
Thank you all for your comments which I will take cognisance ... |
| Topic: deploying flows with WMB v 8.0.0.2 - copying filesystem? |
sealpup
Replies: 14
Views: 7427
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:34 am Subject: deploying flows with WMB v 8.0.0.2 - copying filesystem? |
We have about half a dozen xsds. Not very large.
Ideally they would be handled elsewhere, but we have the legacy to deal with. I'm not too concerned about them - the xsdzip's average about 15k.
I ... |
| Topic: deploying flows with WMB v 8.0.0.2 - copying filesystem? |
sealpup
Replies: 14
Views: 7427
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:43 am Subject: deploying flows with WMB v 8.0.0.2 - copying filesystem? |
Thanks for your assistance.
You are making the assumption that a bar deployment includes only files. This is not true. How do you plan to handle the registry?
As I originally stated, I am runnin ... |
| Topic: deploying flows with WMB v 8.0.0.2 - copying filesystem? |
sealpup
Replies: 14
Views: 7427
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:22 am Subject: deploying flows with WMB v 8.0.0.2 - copying filesystem? |
We are currently on WMB v6.1.0.9, imminently moving to v8.0.0.2, running on RHL.
Our Production messageflow deploys currently take a long time and are on the critical path. We have a number of sneaky ... |
| Topic: MQv7.5 CHLAUTH whitelist (mimic BlockIP2) |
sealpup
Replies: 18
Views: 9042
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 1:07 am Subject: MQv7.5 CHLAUTH whitelist (mimic BlockIP2) |
Thank you all for your comments (both on topic and off).
I met Morag the great at the recent WIUG in Hursley.
I bow. |
| Topic: MQv7.5 CHLAUTH whitelist (mimic BlockIP2) |
sealpup
Replies: 18
Views: 9042
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 4:58 am Subject: MQv7.5 CHLAUTH whitelist (mimic BlockIP2) |
We are currently on MQv6.0.2.10 and allow a number of client applications to connect in through a SVRCONN channel. The channel has BlockIP2 channel exit running against it.
BlockIP2 allows us to pr ... |
| Topic: Cardinality and XML |
sealpup
Replies: 20
Views: 11639
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 7:03 am Subject: Cardinality and XML |
Perhaps this needs clarification.
SET Environment.Variables.XMLNSC.InputXML = InputRoot.XMLNSC.AWDSalesforceMessage;
followed by
SET Opps = CARDINALITY(Environment.Variables.XMLNSC.Input ... |
| Topic: Cardinality and XML |
sealpup
Replies: 20
Views: 11639
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 6:39 am Subject: Cardinality and XML |
Well Vitor,
So you're saying you've discovered that WMB doesn't recognise XML structure unless you associate it with an XML parser?
If you would take the time to read the posts. That is all of ... |
| Topic: Cardinality and XML |
sealpup
Replies: 20
Views: 11639
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 2:33 am Subject: Cardinality and XML |
mgk,
It looks like it is the tree structure that is the problem. As you say I haven't added a new parser, so, this works too....
SET Opps = CARDINALITY(Environment.Variables.anything.InputXM ... |
| Topic: Cardinality and XML |
sealpup
Replies: 20
Views: 11639
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 2:03 am Subject: Cardinality and XML |
Kimbert/mgk,
Thank you for your help. It is much appreciated.
In a flash of inspiration I have resolved this problem.
This code returns the wrong value (with children counted)
SET Environmen ... |
| Topic: Cardinality and XML |
sealpup
Replies: 20
Views: 11639
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 12:55 am Subject: Cardinality and XML |
Thanks for your help.
I don't have to use CARDINALITY, but it should work....
Obviouisly I copied and pasted mgk's suggestion.
The reason I am surprised it returned anything at all, far less co ... |
