| Author |
Message |
 Topic: New RFE: CHLAUTH, Using DNS instead of IP |
rvicter2
Replies: 15
Views: 14745
|
 Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:17 pm Subject: New RFE: CHLAUTH, Using DNS instead of IP |
...got it boss!  |
| Topic: New RFE: CHLAUTH, Using DNS instead of IP |
rvicter2
Replies: 15
Views: 14745
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:29 am Subject: New RFE: CHLAUTH, Using DNS instead of IP |
(and it was a fact not a compliment)...
latter (and conclusive) part of message was
If IBM implements the feature everything would be as easy as "localhost"
...
I agree with your po ... |
| Topic: error logs maintain |
rvicter2
Replies: 5
Views: 3978
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:22 am Subject: error logs maintain |
| delete, (replace?) |
| Topic: New RFE: CHLAUTH, Using DNS instead of IP |
rvicter2
Replies: 15
Views: 14745
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:58 am Subject: New RFE: CHLAUTH, Using DNS instead of IP |
@mvic
You talk just like my boss. He never read the latter(conclusive) part of the message. |
| Topic: error logs maintain |
rvicter2
Replies: 5
Views: 3978
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:55 am Subject: error logs maintain |
| How do i maintain queue manager error logs. I know i can increase its size by MQMAXERRORLOGSIZE variable, are there any other options? |
| Topic: Big IP - Mq |
rvicter2
Replies: 17
Views: 12370
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:21 am Subject: Big IP - Mq |
Thanks for the answer and the insight(honestly).
But my point(assertion) was CCDT does not load balance messages and does not load balance new connections. I stick by it. |
| Topic: Big IP - Mq |
rvicter2
Replies: 17
Views: 12370
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:07 am Subject: Big IP - Mq |
| I'll just pick and choose the best answers. Like someone here said we need to maintain a casual atmosphere. Editing is important sometimes |
| Topic: Big IP - Mq |
rvicter2
Replies: 17
Views: 12370
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:53 am Subject: Big IP - Mq |
CCDT does not provide load balancing of messages. CCDT does not provide load balancing for new connections.
This is AFAIK is correct. |
| Topic: Big IP - Mq |
rvicter2
Replies: 17
Views: 12370
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:45 am Subject: Big IP - Mq |
| CCDT is good for failover but i AFAIK it does not provide load balancing. |
| Topic: Big IP - Mq |
rvicter2
Replies: 17
Views: 12370
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:04 pm Subject: Big IP - Mq |
We are planning to get an MQ consultant for this future project.
Thanks peter and mvic.
I guess we'll just need the mqserver variable then. |
| Topic: Big IP - Mq |
rvicter2
Replies: 17
Views: 12370
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:03 pm Subject: Big IP - Mq |
| nothing that would answer my question. |
| Topic: Big IP - Mq |
rvicter2
Replies: 17
Views: 12370
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:34 pm Subject: Big IP - Mq |
| Can an application connect to Big Ip which will then connect to a queue on MQ server, w/o a tab file? I could not find anything with google |
| Topic: Datapower - rfhutil - MQ |
rvicter2
Replies: 6
Views: 11228
|
Forum: WebSphere DataPower Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:50 am Subject: Datapower - rfhutil - MQ |
I had already done that. (qmgr, queus, port)
Thanks tho'. |
| Topic: Datapower - rfhutil - MQ |
rvicter2
Replies: 6
Views: 11228
|
Forum: WebSphere DataPower Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:28 am Subject: Datapower - rfhutil - MQ |
I just realized I don't want such a utility. It's stupid to look for one.
Sorry for wasting your time. |
| Topic: Datapower - rfhutil - MQ |
rvicter2
Replies: 6
Views: 11228
|
Forum: WebSphere DataPower Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:00 am Subject: Datapower - rfhutil - MQ |
We are planning to implement Datapower...so the Datapower team wants to test messaging passing to/from an MQ queue. Anything you can suggest?
except connecting directly as it will later! |
