| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Toolkit and Broker |
rknox
Replies: 2
Views: 1870
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 8:15 am Subject: Toolkit and Broker |
| Is there any reason to require developers to keep a toolkit version in synch with the Broker runtime? I notice the toolkit and broker have completely different fixes but the numbers do seem to correl ... |
| Topic: Tracing message through Broker |
rknox
Replies: 8
Views: 4557
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 4:53 am Subject: Tracing message through Broker |
| I was under the impression that putting trace nodes into production flows is bad practice since they cause so much overhead in processing. Is this inaccurate? |
| Topic: Tracing message through Broker |
rknox
Replies: 8
Views: 4557
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:21 am Subject: Tracing message through Broker |
| We are moving from ICS to Message Broker. In ICS, we could turn up trace on the connector controllers to actually see the contents of the message before it went into ICS and as it left ICS which grea ... |
| Topic: Message Broker best practices |
rknox
Replies: 12
Views: 10003
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 7:42 am Subject: Message Broker best practices |
| Peter are you saying that you have over 250 flows defined to your execution groups within a single broker instance? Do you run into problems by getting too many flows defined to a single broker? I a ... |
| Topic: Message Broker best practices |
rknox
Replies: 12
Views: 10003
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 6:09 am Subject: Message Broker best practices |
| jefflowrey, is that max thread count of 255 documented somewhere so I could read a little more about it? I would investigate more about execution group threads in a larger context if it is available. |
| Topic: Message Broker best practices |
rknox
Replies: 12
Views: 10003
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 6:04 am Subject: Message Broker best practices |
| I recall where I heard about the 1-1 ratio recommendation. We had a consultant who was hired through IBM to come and help us implement Broker. He told us about IBM's recommendations. I heard it sec ... |
| Topic: Message Broker best practices |
rknox
Replies: 12
Views: 10003
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 5:56 am Subject: Message Broker best practices |
| I thought I had read that IBM's recommendation is a 1 application per 1 execution group but now I can't find it. What actually constitutes an application? A number of flows that perform like functio ... |
| Topic: Message Broker best practices |
rknox
Replies: 12
Views: 10003
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 5:19 am Subject: Message Broker best practices |
| An Execution group itself is cost effective since it simply runs as an OS process. Our management has made a decision to charge our business partners by execution group. That decision has been made ... |
| Topic: Message Broker best practices |
rknox
Replies: 12
Views: 10003
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 11:31 am Subject: Message Broker best practices |
| We have implemented Message Broker and have been using it successfully for nearly a year. We run version 6.1.0.1 on AIX. We are beginning to see signs of overloading each execution group with too ma ... |
| Topic: FileOutput node FTP in WMB 6.1 |
rknox
Replies: 9
Views: 6335
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 7:14 am Subject: FileOutput node FTP in WMB 6.1 |
| I do infrastructure work with jharringa. I cannot find this APAR that is referenced. I have searched google and IBM but come up with nothing. Any help would be appreciated. |
| Topic: Shared Qmgr for Broker and Configuration Manager |
rknox
Replies: 6
Views: 3923
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:44 am Subject: Shared Qmgr for Broker and Configuration Manager |
| I don't mean to hijack this thread, but Peter would you also recommend putting a usernameserver on separate hardware? We are just beginning to consider pub/sub and I'm doing some initial reading on t ... |
| Topic: Broker SAPRequest JRE question |
rknox
Replies: 16
Views: 12374
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:21 am Subject: Broker SAPRequest JRE question |
| Thanks everyone for your input. We had to use the trace to figure out what exact fields were required. The doc doesn't say which fields are required and also some fields that are required are actual ... |
| Topic: Broker SAPRequest JRE question |
rknox
Replies: 16
Views: 12374
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:59 am Subject: Broker SAPRequest JRE question |
This is a full error from the trace user trace:
BIP3484E: ''CWYAP3068:Cursor.getNext() method call failed, verify that the input business object Cursor com.ibm.broker.despi.MbTopLevelInputCursor@68 ... |
| Topic: Broker SAPRequest JRE question |
rknox
Replies: 16
Views: 12374
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 6:49 am Subject: Broker SAPRequest JRE question |
| I just found out it was before the mqsiprofile. So most likely it was running with java 1.5.0. But the flow still did work on 6.1.0.0 and it does not on 6.1.0.1. |
| Topic: Broker SAPRequest JRE question |
rknox
Replies: 16
Views: 12374
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 6:32 am Subject: Broker SAPRequest JRE question |
| It isn't my environment that the 6.1.0.0 was installed on, but I had the person who owns the runtime to do a java -version with the ID that starts up broker and that showed 1.4.2. I spoke with IBM an ... |
