| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Efficiency of processing messages in two phases |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 8
Views: 15950
|
 Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 2:40 am Subject: Efficiency of processing messages in two phases |
Current we use MQ in a simple way – getting and consuming each message in separate work-unit in a FIFO manner.
A colleague is seeking input on the feasibility of changing to a scheme whereby ... |
| Topic: HermesJMS is adding RFH2 Header |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 17
Views: 40254
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 3:15 am Subject: Re: Queue Destination |
The trick would have been to bundle it with the installation of MQClient... :innocent:
Probably!
But I gather there was also a feeling that MQ Explorer is a bit too powerful to be trusted in devel ... |
| Topic: HermesJMS is adding RFH2 Header |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 17
Views: 40254
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 2:26 am Subject: Re: Queue Destination |
Care to explain why?
I don't really know, I myself do have MQ Explorer (though I am about to get a new PC and will lose it).
But I handed over my "dogsbody" duties to another team and t ... |
| Topic: HermesJMS is adding RFH2 Header |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 17
Views: 40254
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 1:26 am Subject: Re: Queue Destination |
You want targetClient=1 or targetClient=MQ ...
Just started using HermesJMS and hit the same problem. It must be a common one.
Anwyay, this works fine for one queue but we have 100s. Is there a ... |
| Topic: WMQ v6 QMErrorLog on Sun Solaris |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 9
Views: 10875
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 3:03 am Subject: WMQ v6 QMErrorLog on Sun Solaris |
Ages ago...
No, in Windows it's set in the MQExplorer.
(my emphasis)
Ah, maybe that's why, although the docs say the following:
The capacity can be altered in the Extended queue manager proper ... |
| Topic: Compiling BlockIP2 for Solaris using cc |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 4
Views: 20728
|
Forum: User Exits Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 5:24 am Subject: Compiling BlockIP2 for Solaris using cc |
I mean, not ok. Bad bad admin, running v6, no biscuit. But, well, these are the things that are what they are.
I had a recurrent reminder all last spring and summer and emailed my bosses regularly ... |
| Topic: Compiling BlockIP2 for Solaris using cc |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 4
Views: 20728
|
Forum: User Exits Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 1:00 am Subject: Compiling BlockIP2 for Solaris using cc |
You could try the more recent
I don't immediately spot any significant difference. (The use of -xarch=v9 suggests they too are a bit out of date. SunStudio12 says "cc: Warning: -xarch=v9 is d ... |
| Topic: Compiling BlockIP2 for Solaris using cc |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 4
Views: 20728
|
Forum: User Exits Posted: Wed May 08, 2013 8:35 am Subject: Compiling BlockIP2 for Solaris using cc |
I need to recompile BlockIP2 to increase the number of hosts allowed.
If I follow cc: Warning: -xarch=v9 is deprecated, use -m64 to create 64-bit programs
cc: Warning: a -xcode val ... |
| Topic: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 29
Views: 30350
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 2:37 am Subject: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
As I explained in See if
Thanks. I think I have now enough quotations from the manuals to make it clear what should happen. That being so, it seemc clear that what is happening is not what shoul ... |
| Topic: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 29
Views: 30350
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 8:10 am Subject: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
Thanks.
It does appear wrong. Open a PMR and please share the results with us.
Sadly this is MQ 6, which is EOSLName: WebSphere MQ
Version: 6.0.2.5
CMVC level: p600-205-080 ... |
| Topic: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 29
Views: 30350
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:01 am Subject: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
| Beg to differ. WMQ relies on the underlying OS for this feature. If the underlying OS has in fact handed this off to LDAP or similar, and LDAP does not properly provide the information WMQ needs it's ... |
| Topic: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 29
Views: 30350
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:37 am Subject: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
No, it's a change to your OS
That's way beyond the kind of thing I am allowed to do. And I doubt that our Unix admin people (or our auditors) would take kindly to the suggestion that we change it, ... |
| Topic: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 29
Views: 30350
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:44 am Subject: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
Try using basic passwd/group instead and see if it makes a difference.
I am not sure I can do that .. unless it's a setting within MQ.
MQ does not know what is being used under the covers of the O ... |
| Topic: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 29
Views: 30350
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:28 am Subject: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
Do you have LDAP, Active Directory, etc. etc. in place as your user/group system?
It is LDAP-based (as I understand it).
Either way, that raises some interesting questions. What difference might ... |
| Topic: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
mqdogsbody
Replies: 29
Views: 30350
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:36 am Subject: MQ Authorization and Unix Groups |
Did you refresh security or restart the qm after changing the membership of the infosys group?
Not explicitly, but the user account has been in that group for ages (since it was set up) and my QM is ... |
