| Author |
Message |
 Topic: MQ support across two platforms by two seperate suppliers |
MQ dummy
Replies: 8
Views: 5454
|
 Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:32 pm Subject: MQ support across two platforms by two seperate suppliers |
| My sincere thanks to you all for replying. I think the note Paul made is a key point as to whether our organisation can split MQ support at the mainframe and server levels "..The success or fail ... |
| Topic: MQ support across two platforms by two seperate suppliers |
MQ dummy
Replies: 8
Views: 5454
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:31 pm Subject: MQ support across two platforms by two seperate suppliers |
| My role is project management in an orgnaisation with many offices. Currrently one external provider supports MQ across the mainframe and three servers. Due to contractual issues the organisation wa ... |
| Topic: User Defined Configurable Service using Java compute node |
mq_dummy
Replies: 7
Views: 5708
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:01 am Subject: User Defined Configurable Service using Java compute node |
If you want to provide data from a user defined configurable service to your EQSL, you do not need a java compute node.
I propose to define an external java function in ESQL. Then you can query the ... |
| Topic: Problem in connect to queue manger trhough java |
mq_dummy
Replies: 3
Views: 4276
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:10 am Subject: Problem in connect to queue manger trhough java |
You do not share much about your environment.
1) MQ7.5 is installed locally on your windows and you want to connect to a local queue manager?
2) You are using the jars of this local installation ... |
| Topic: problem with the Message in MQGet node |
mq_dummy
Replies: 3
Views: 3818
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 7:03 am Subject: problem with the Message in MQGet node |
| Works as designed. The message you get with the MQGet node is only available at the output terminals of the node. |
| Topic: Properties versus MQMD |
mq_dummy
Replies: 14
Views: 13249
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 1:34 am Subject: Properties versus MQMD |
Thanks for the idea!
I work with 7.0.0.3 and 7.0.0.5. In both cases the description in the documentation and the behaviour of the broker is like I stated. So this is not the solution. |
| Topic: Properties versus MQMD |
mq_dummy
Replies: 14
Views: 13249
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 11:58 am Subject: Properties versus MQMD |
But this is the point. In this case I modified both on purpose!
And as I try to state, I am not sure if the flow behaves like it is described in the documentation. I am more than glad, if somebody ca ... |
| Topic: Properties versus MQMD |
mq_dummy
Replies: 14
Views: 13249
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 12:38 am Subject: Properties versus MQMD |
Please, can you once more comment on this. I would really appreciate an answer to this topic.
Thank you for the answers so far.
And I withdraw the question concerning the HTTPInput node.
But ... |
| Topic: Properties versus MQMD |
mq_dummy
Replies: 14
Views: 13249
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 5:03 am Subject: Properties versus MQMD |
Thank you for the answers so far.
And I withdraw the question concerning the HTTPInput node.
But case 2 with the MQInput node I do not understand.
1. In this case MQMD should have precedence ov ... |
| Topic: Properties versus MQMD |
mq_dummy
Replies: 14
Views: 13249
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 1:50 am Subject: Properties versus MQMD |
Hi all,
in the documentation I read the chapter "Properties versus MQMD folder behavior for various transports" (publib. boulder. ibm. com/ infocenter/ wmbhelp/ v7r0m0/ topic/ com.ibm.eto ... |
