| Author |
Message |
 Topic: IMPACT 2009 |
moorej_gl
Replies: 8
Views: 8548
|
 Forum: General Discussion Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:12 pm Subject: Re: IMPACT 2009 |
Why? Anything you can share now, however hi level?
Managers will need some reasons to go again this year if someone went last year.
Seriously - the impact website isn't offering too much in th ... |
| Topic: ExecutionGroupProxy method to retrieve MessageFlowDependency |
moorej_gl
Replies: 2
Views: 3141
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:18 am Subject: ExecutionGroupProxy method to retrieve MessageFlowDependency |
Anyway, ExecutionGroupProxy.getDeployedObjectByName() will do what you want.
You're right - that works fine. Thanks!  |
| Topic: ExecutionGroupProxy method to retrieve MessageFlowDependency |
moorej_gl
Replies: 2
Views: 3141
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:53 am Subject: ExecutionGroupProxy method to retrieve MessageFlowDependency |
| Hi there - The infocenter page for the ExecutionGroupProxy class lists only the method getMessageFlowDependencies() for retrieving info about deployed message sets, jars, etc. from a configmgr. Howev ... |
| Topic: IMPACT |
moorej_gl
Replies: 25
Views: 18322
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:02 am Subject: IMPACT |
So what did they do after Love Shack?
Well, there was the Flintstone's theme song cover...
It doesn't matter - there's enough nostalgia involved to make it worthwhile.
On the broker sessions ... |
| Topic: IMPACT |
moorej_gl
Replies: 25
Views: 18322
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 8:31 am Subject: IMPACT |
| I'm still on the fence after hearing so many negative comments about 2007. And I was only seeing a handful of broker-specific sessions in the technical track (which, by the way, I find to be a little ... |
| Topic: 32-bit execution group under 64-bit broker |
moorej_gl
Replies: 1
Views: 2316
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:15 pm Subject: 32-bit execution group under 64-bit broker |
Hi there - I created a 64-bit v6.1 broker on a 64-bit rhel 5 server. We have 64-bit DB2 9 installed, and everything seems to be working just fine so far.
I tried to deploy to the default EG, but ... |
| Topic: Need Input on MQ Conference |
moorej_gl
Replies: 16
Views: 10967
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:39 am Subject: Need Input on MQ Conference |
But, on the fourth day when you look around and the expo is shut down and the number of educational sessions cut down, it makes you wonder why you stayed for the full gambit!
I don't know about tha ... |
| Topic: WebSphere Message Broker V6.1 |
moorej_gl
Replies: 65
Views: 49055
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:05 am Subject: WebSphere Message Broker V6.1 |
"Large file processing" means that the broker doesn't need to load the entire file into memory in order to process it - it can stream record-by-record.
That's so awesome. And so are the f ... |
| Topic: WebSphere Message Broker V6.1 |
moorej_gl
Replies: 65
Views: 49055
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:33 am Subject: WebSphere Message Broker V6.1 |
| mqmatt - Would you mind explaining what "real-time graphical performance analysis" would provide? And also, is "native support for large file processing" just a native ftp node, o ... |
| Topic: Project inconsistent |
moorej_gl
Replies: 9
Views: 9292
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 2:03 pm Subject: Project inconsistent |
| One of our developers encountered a very similar problem this morning. A clean and rebuild did not fix the problem. Seemed fine, though, when I deleted the project from the toolkit (using the 'do not ... |
| Topic: identifying performance bottleneck - 2% CPU usage, 8% mem |
moorej_gl
Replies: 2
Views: 3204
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 7:36 am Subject: identifying performance bottleneck - 2% CPU usage, 8% mem |
| Do you have any other I/O going on? We had a similar message flow with bottlenecks even while utilizing additional instances. I found later that the developer had left a few trace nodes in the message ... |
| Topic: Question about DST patch requirements with WBI |
moorej_gl
Replies: 10
Views: 18802
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:53 pm Subject: Question about DST patch requirements with WBI |
| I found it very worthwhile to open a PMR for this. Though we weren't trying to interpret the findings one way or another, there are certainly several paths to choose from to achieve DST compliance... ... |
| Topic: ODBC data source changes while broker is running? |
moorej_gl
Replies: 6
Views: 4978
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:50 am Subject: ODBC data source changes while broker is running? |
| Yep, I was able to do the same in our test system. Restarted the broker, exercised a couple message flows using the data source. Changed the data source and exercised other message flows also using ... |
| Topic: ODBC data source changes while broker is running? |
moorej_gl
Replies: 6
Views: 4978
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:20 pm Subject: ODBC data source changes while broker is running? |
Right - I'll set it up just as soon as my pulse returns to a normal rate.  |
| Topic: ODBC data source changes while broker is running? |
moorej_gl
Replies: 6
Views: 4978
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:08 pm Subject: ODBC data source changes while broker is running? |
| Right, I understand that no errors like this would occur without a message to be processed. My point in mentioning the broker restart was that I'm trying to figure out when the broker would have pick ... |
