Author |
Message |
Topic: Missing shared libraries on 64 bit install (version 7.5) |
mhubbard
Replies: 7 Views: 8887
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2013 9:10 am Subject: Missing shared libraries on 64 bit install (version 7.5) |
I have found it! Sorry for wasting your time. It was a coding issue on my side that had this rather strange manifestation. I wasn't properly sending in the string defining my channel. Perhaps with ... |
Topic: Missing shared libraries on 64 bit install (version 7.5) |
mhubbard
Replies: 7 Views: 8887
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2013 8:56 am Subject: Missing shared libraries on 64 bit install (version 7.5) |
Well it's a bit messy since our builds all use ant - but I was able to extract these commands:
g++ -g -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -DGCCV4 -DDEBUG '-DHOSTNAME="${env.HOST}"' '-DUSER="mhubba ... |
Topic: Missing shared libraries on 64 bit install (version 7.5) |
mhubbard
Replies: 7 Views: 8887
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2013 7:24 am Subject: Missing shared libraries on 64 bit install (version 7.5) |
No - not at all. googling that library, I got the impression it was related to that - but I had no idea why it was being requested. .....maybe a missing channel table..... |
Topic: Missing shared libraries on 64 bit install (version 7.5) |
mhubbard
Replies: 7 Views: 8887
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:14 am Subject: Missing shared libraries on 64 bit install (version 7.5) |
Hello - it has been a while.
I have downloaded both the i386 and the x86_64 versions of WMQ v 7.5 for Linux. My server is running i386 and has been built and is working beautifully. I can connect t ... |
Topic: Separating Channel Access |
mhubbard
Replies: 4 Views: 2964
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 12:06 pm Subject: Separating Channel Access |
Wow.
And I guess since I don't see any port specification on my cluster sender / receiver channels that those are included also. Ouch. |
Topic: Separating Channel Access |
mhubbard
Replies: 4 Views: 2964
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 9:42 am Subject: Separating Channel Access |
Hello -
I have several v6 queue managers that were configured some time ago with SSL channels that client applications out on the internet use to connect from "the outside world". On these ... |
Topic: 2393 After Server Upgrade |
mhubbard
Replies: 5 Views: 5707
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 11:19 am Subject: 2393 After Server Upgrade |
I guess I'll reply to my own message in case someone else ends up in this hell. For cipher spec: TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA between MQ6.0 and MQ5.3 there is a mismatch. This is outlined in http:// ... |
Topic: 2393 After Server Upgrade |
mhubbard
Replies: 5 Views: 5707
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:11 am Subject: 2393 After Server Upgrade |
Thanks for responding.
But the 5.3 server is root and the 6.0 server is root.
the 5.3 client is root and the 6.0 client is root.
5.3 can talk to 5.3 and 6.0 can talk to 6.0, so conversation is poss ... |
Topic: 2393 After Server Upgrade |
mhubbard
Replies: 5 Views: 5707
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:52 am Subject: 2393 After Server Upgrade |
Hello - I have a Websphere MQ Server V 6.0 running on Redhat. I am running this on vmware, so, luckily, I also have a clone of this box before it was upgraded from 5.3.
I have about 2500 client boxe ... |
Topic: 2393 on ssl connection after 5.3 to 6.0 upgrade |
mhubbard
Replies: 1 Views: 3280
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 5:43 am Subject: 2393 on ssl connection after 5.3 to 6.0 upgrade |
Never mind....please don't waste any time.
I mistakenly thought my servers had been upgraded to 6.0, but they are still at 5.3. I need to fix that first and see what happens. |
Topic: 2393 on ssl connection after 5.3 to 6.0 upgrade |
mhubbard
Replies: 1 Views: 3280
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 5:20 am Subject: 2393 on ssl connection after 5.3 to 6.0 upgrade |
Hello - it's been a while....
I am running v6.0 MQ servers on Red Hat and I have many clients that are currently connecting over SSL channels but are still using the 5.3 client. I am now working to ... |
Topic: AMQ7047 with dspmqver after install of 6.0 |
mhubbard
Replies: 7 Views: 10557
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 3:26 am Subject: AMQ7047 with dspmqver after install of 6.0 |
No FDC's.....but I got it. As we all could of guessed from the start, it was something I screwed up. I forgot to tell alien (the package converter) to include the scripts in the debian package it cr ... |
Topic: AMQ7047 with dspmqver after install of 6.0 |
mhubbard
Replies: 7 Views: 10557
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 11:50 am Subject: AMQ7047 with dspmqver after install of 6.0 |
I take it the Trial version of the software magically comes statically linked to all the correct versions of the libraries or something? Of course not.
Thanks anyways. |
Topic: AMQ7047 with dspmqver after install of 6.0 |
mhubbard
Replies: 7 Views: 10557
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 10:16 am Subject: AMQ7047 with dspmqver after install of 6.0 |
Well - we have been running debian in production (and Websphere MQ 5.3 on it) for coming up on 2 years now. I have had no complaints.
Even the 6.0 client code ran perfectly (from the trial version ... |
Topic: AMQ7047 with dspmqver after install of 6.0 |
mhubbard
Replies: 7 Views: 10557
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 9:19 am Subject: AMQ7047 with dspmqver after install of 6.0 |
Hello - My setup is a little different, but please hear me out. I am running on debian linux with their newest stable release called etch. I have a great deal of MQ 5.3 in house now and I wanted to ... |