| Author |
Message |
 Topic: MQ Broker v7.0 - Java Compute Node Transaction Participation |
liviur
Replies: 10
Views: 15411
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 10:04 am Subject: MQ Broker v7.0 - Java Compute Node Transaction Participation |
That makes it clear. Will use WSMB nodes.
The time you've taken to explain is greatly appreciated! |
| Topic: MQ Broker v7.0 - Java Compute Node Transaction Participation |
liviur
Replies: 10
Views: 15411
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 9:47 am Subject: MQ Broker v7.0 - Java Compute Node Transaction Participation |
I wholeheartedly agree with both of you and may end up using the WSMB component to achieve my goals, partially or completely bypassing the legacy code.
However, it would have been nice to understa ... |
| Topic: MQ Broker v7.0 - Java Compute Node Transaction Participation |
liviur
Replies: 10
Views: 15411
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 9:24 am Subject: MQ Broker v7.0 - Java Compute Node Transaction Participation |
Hi all,
Thank you for your quick replies.
1. Point taken - when and if my organization will pay for said courses I will gladly participate 
2. There is nothing wrong with the MQGet node h ... |
| Topic: MQ Broker v7.0 - Java Compute Node Transaction Participation |
liviur
Replies: 10
Views: 15411
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 8:51 am Subject: MQ Broker v7.0 - Java Compute Node Transaction Participation |
Hi,
Environment: Windows XP, IBM MQ Broker v7.0
I have a simple flow: MQInput node -> Java Compute Node -> MQOutput node.
The MQInput node has Transaction: YES and reads a message from ... |
| Topic: Failed .Net/MQ/SqlSrvr05 Put in TransactionScope=no rollbck? |
liviur
Replies: 30
Views: 54613
|
Forum: Multiphase Commit Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:55 am Subject: Almost forgot... |
| ... you'll also need to use the overloaded version of the TransactionScope constructor which accepts an EnterpriseServicesInteropOption parameter and set it to EnterpriseServicesInteropOption.Automati ... |
| Topic: Failed .Net/MQ/SqlSrvr05 Put in TransactionScope=no rollbck? |
liviur
Replies: 30
Views: 54613
|
Forum: Multiphase Commit Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:32 am Subject: PutMessageOptions incomplete |
| Regardless if you're using a class derived from ServicedComponent or the TransactionScope class, you'll have to "OR" the PutMessageOptions Options property with MQC.MQGMO_SYNCPOINT otherwise ... |
| Topic: Grouping and Logical Order question |
liviur
Replies: 6
Views: 7786
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 7:17 am Subject: Grouping and Logical Order question |
Hello EddieA,
The main reason we're not able to use MQPMO_LOGICAL_ORDER is because we're transmitting a large message in several chunks and implemented checkpoiting. MQ requires that you keep the c ... |
| Topic: Grouping and Logical Order question |
liviur
Replies: 6
Views: 7786
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 12:49 pm Subject: re: from the documentation |
sirsi,
That's what I figured also. However, there's no mention if the Queue Manager will insure sequential delivery of said messages, once the application does set the required fields. One can only ... |
| Topic: Grouping and Logical Order question |
liviur
Replies: 6
Views: 7786
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 5:26 am Subject: Grouping and Logical Order question |
Hello,
I'd like to validate an assumption I've made, for which the documentation is a bit unclear (at least from my perspective):
If I don't use MQPMO_LOGICAL_ORDER but rather manually (at the a ... |
| Topic: MQ Configuration for Large Message transfer |
liviur
Replies: 7
Views: 7138
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 6:07 am Subject: MQ Configuration for Large Message transfer |
Peter, Thank you for your reply.
None of the MQ PUT calls fails. In fact, if I wait long enough my application finishes and commits all messages to the queue. Oh, I'm sorry I wasn't explicit enoug ... |
| Topic: MQ Configuration for Large Message transfer |
liviur
Replies: 7
Views: 7138
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:45 pm Subject: MQ Configuration for Large Message transfer |
| Thank you for the reply. I wasn't aware of this product and will definitely investigate its capabilities and the possibility of using it for our purposes. From what I've read so far it looks pretty go ... |
| Topic: MQ Configuration for Large Message transfer |
liviur
Replies: 7
Views: 7138
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:59 am Subject: MQ Configuration for Large Message transfer |
Jeff & Tibor,
Thank you for your prompt replies.
1. We're using CIRCULAR logging but intend to change it to LINEAR in the near future (for all the benefits it brings).
2. The chunks are c ... |
| Topic: MQ Configuration for Large Message transfer |
liviur
Replies: 7
Views: 7138
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:07 am Subject: MQ Configuration for Large Message transfer |
Hello,
We're developing software to transfer large files via MQ (5.3) between multiple platforms in our enterprise. Our current design is to split file contents into multiple chunks, which we'll pu ... |
| Topic: AMQMDNET Message issue |
liviur
Replies: 1
Views: 2824
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:01 am Subject: Got workaround |
Upon further investigation (using ildasm to look at IL in IBM.WMQAX) it turns out MessageIdHex is simply a method to convert the MessageId (byte
internal sealed class MQUtility
{
static priv ... |
| Topic: AMQMDNET Message issue |
liviur
Replies: 1
Views: 2824
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:03 am Subject: AMQMDNET Message issue |
Environment: Win2K, C# program referencing AMQMDNET.dll
Looks like IBM folks forgot to (or didn't want to) port the MessageIdHex property of MQMessage (IBM.WMQAX namespace) to their .Net counterpar ... |
