| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Connections between MQ versions 5.2 and 5.3 to 7.0 |
jlalbor
Replies: 4
Views: 4752
|
 Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:00 pm Subject: Connections between MQ versions 5.2 and 5.3 to 7.0 |
The WMQ v7.0 general announcement letter (April 2008) contains this little gem:
Compatibility: WebSphere® MQ V7.0 queue managers and clients interoperate with queue managers and clients from any pre ... |
| Topic: Connections between MQ versions 5.2 and 5.3 to 7.0 |
jlalbor
Replies: 4
Views: 4752
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:40 pm Subject: Re: Connections between MQ versions 5.2 and 5.3 to 7.0 |
I know WMQv5.3 connects to WMQv7.
Vitor, thank you very much.
Does anyone had tried version 5.2 with version 7?
. |
| Topic: Connections between MQ versions 5.2 and 5.3 to 7.0 |
jlalbor
Replies: 4
Views: 4752
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:18 pm Subject: Connections between MQ versions 5.2 and 5.3 to 7.0 |
Does anyone know if a MQ Sender channel in a QM from version 5.2 and 5.3 connects to/and works with a MQ Receiver channel in a QM version 7.0?
I Know that version 5.2 and 5.3 are out of support sin ... |
| Topic: Datapower and Transformation Extender Industry Packs |
jlalbor
Replies: 0
Views: 6632
|
Forum: WebSphere DataPower Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm Subject: Datapower and Transformation Extender Industry Packs |
| Hello, I remember that a few months ago I read that the maps created using the transformation extender desing studio and the Industry packs (FIX, EDIFACT, SWIFT, etc) for the WTX were not supported in ... |
| Topic: MQ authorization service |
jlalbor
Replies: 5
Views: 7136
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:38 am Subject: MQ authorization service |
Rigth now our customer is authenticating using a security exit.
It would be posible that this would have to change if the OAM is replaced with other kind of security component that supports both, a ... |
| Topic: MQ authorization service |
jlalbor
Replies: 5
Views: 7136
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:20 am Subject: MQ authorization service |
I'm curious. What issues do you have with OAM that would lead you to look for a replacement?
OAM works fine, the situation we are facing is that a customer would like to separate the MQ administra ... |
| Topic: MQ authorization service |
jlalbor
Replies: 5
Views: 7136
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:42 pm Subject: MQ authorization service |
| Hello, Does anyone know if there are any available third party authorization services for WebSphere MQ to use instead the Object Authority Manager (OAM)? |
| Topic: JavaCompute Node java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError [SOLVED] |
jlalbor
Replies: 4
Views: 13275
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 3:36 pm Subject: SOLVED |
| I have found that the Broker only loads jar files, not zip files. I have rename the ojdbc14.zip file to ojdbc14.jar and now the JavaCompute Node works fine without the need of adding the reference to ... |
| Topic: JavaCompute Node java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError [SOLVED] |
jlalbor
Replies: 4
Views: 13275
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:56 pm Subject: JavaCompute Node java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError [SOLVED] |
Thanks jefflowrey for the answer
Maybe i did not explain myself correctly, but actually I put the ojdbc14.zip in the /var/mqsi/shared-classes folder, and restarted the broker, but apparently this i ... |
| Topic: JavaCompute Node java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError [SOLVED] |
jlalbor
Replies: 4
Views: 13275
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:15 am Subject: JavaCompute Node java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError [SOLVED] |
We are using WMB 6 CSD3
OS AIX 5.2-9
I have create a JavaCompute Node that requieres the java library ojdbc14.zip file in order to connect to an Oracle DataBase using JDBC type 4 Driver.
In the ... |
| Topic: [ODBC Oracle driver]Optional feature not implemented |
jlalbor
Replies: 7
Views: 10660
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 5:37 pm Subject: [ODBC Oracle driver]Optional feature not implemented |
No, it needs to be enabled for Broker. Do not set it to 0.
You, however, had "EnableDescribeParam" in your ODBC datasource listing, and not "EnableSQLDescribeParam".
Maybe th ... |
| Topic: [ODBC Oracle driver]Optional feature not implemented |
jlalbor
Replies: 7
Views: 10660
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:30 am Subject: [ODBC Oracle driver]Optional feature not implemented |
Shoulnd't that be EnableSQLDescribeParam?
Hi jefflowrey,
Do you know how the EnableSQLDescribeParam parameter works?
I will set it to 0 and see what happens.
Thanks. |
| Topic: [ODBC Oracle driver]Optional feature not implemented |
jlalbor
Replies: 7
Views: 10660
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:20 am Subject: [ODBC Oracle driver]Optional feature not implemented |
Perhaps this?
Hi Tibor, I cant not see why it could be a Page Conversion problem.
Could you explain please?
The Broker is running on AIX and the remote Oracle DB is also running on AIX.
Th ... |
| Topic: [ODBC Oracle driver]Optional feature not implemented |
jlalbor
Replies: 7
Views: 10660
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:20 am Subject: [ODBC Oracle driver]Optional feature not implemented |
| Before yesterday I created a topic about this issue, but i have figured out the real problem (the odbc.ini file was using old Broker V5 merant drivers), so I decided to deleted that topic and create t ... |
| Topic: Configuration manager migration from version 5 to version 6 |
jlalbor
Replies: 5
Views: 5528
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 8:38 am Subject: Configuration manager migration from version 5 to version 6 |
OK Matt, we will raise a PMR. I will update the post as soon as i have an answer from IBM.
Thanks a lot. |
