| Author |
Message |
 Topic: changeflowmonitoring after deployment in v8 |
gilc
Replies: 10
Views: 6703
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sat Aug 24, 2013 11:19 pm Subject: changeflowmonitoring after deployment in v8 |
After a long dialog with IBM, I've received a final answer on the subject.
IBM Labs are saying that it's the product's normal behavior in v8, even though the Info Center in v7 and v8 shows the same ... |
| Topic: changeflowmonitoring after deployment in v8 |
gilc
Replies: 10
Views: 6703
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 4:00 am Subject: changeflowmonitoring after deployment in v8 |
| Yeah no problem. Still waiting for their reply... |
| Topic: changeflowmonitoring after deployment in v8 |
gilc
Replies: 10
Views: 6703
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:38 am Subject: Re: changeflowmonitoring after deployment in v8 |
This is the first project I'm doing with v8.0.0.2 and until now all the projects I've worked on in v7 didn't have this "feature" - the monitoring state stayed active even after deployment. ... |
| Topic: changeflowmonitoring after deployment in v8 |
gilc
Replies: 10
Views: 6703
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 11:26 pm Subject: changeflowmonitoring after deployment in v8 |
@smdavies99
Thanks for the response.
We're not in production yet and so that's why we have so many deploys. We're deploying bars as simple as it gets.
I didn't want to get into ant or any other s ... |
| Topic: changeflowmonitoring after deployment in v8 |
gilc
Replies: 10
Views: 6703
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:05 am Subject: changeflowmonitoring after deployment in v8 |
@smdavies99
Thanks for the response.
We're not in production yet and so that's why we have so many deploys. We're deploying bars as simple as it gets.
I didn't want to get into ant or any other s ... |
| Topic: changeflowmonitoring after deployment in v8 |
gilc
Replies: 10
Views: 6703
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:28 am Subject: changeflowmonitoring after deployment in v8 |
Hey all,
As known, to active monitoring events I should run the command mqsichangeflowmonitoring (After configuring events and so on).
Problem is that after every deployment of a flow, I need to r ... |
| Topic: Collector node? Maybe a different design? |
gilc
Replies: 12
Views: 9537
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:16 am Subject: Collector node? Maybe a different design? |
But that's just a little story about the business regardless to the Collection issue which is a new requirement for this specific project.
... and thus an opportunity for you to build something t ... |
| Topic: Collector node? Maybe a different design? |
gilc
Replies: 12
Views: 9537
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:06 am Subject: Collector node? Maybe a different design? |
| They work here with closed projects that are separate from one another. For every new project they copy-paste the infra from one to another and it works "fine" cause the basics are the same ... |
| Topic: Collector node? Maybe a different design? |
gilc
Replies: 12
Views: 9537
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:34 pm Subject: Collector node? Maybe a different design? |
@jeff
Duly noted.
@lance
Hmm I actually never knew about this. definitely worth a read!
@smdavies
I wish I could use DB here (if not for this solution then for other issues). The manager is ... |
| Topic: Collector node? Maybe a different design? |
gilc
Replies: 12
Views: 9537
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:08 am Subject: Collector node? Maybe a different design? |
Hey jeff
I also thought of the idea of sending each record independently to a collector but as you said it might cause a performance issue especially because the bulk size will probably be 10 and w ... |
| Topic: Collector node? Maybe a different design? |
gilc
Replies: 12
Views: 9537
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 4:43 am Subject: Collector node? Maybe a different design? |
Hey lance
First of all thanks for the reply.
The problem is that we don't always wait for X messages. We wait for X messages OR until Timeout (I probably didn't explain myself enough the first t ... |
| Topic: Collector node? Maybe a different design? |
gilc
Replies: 12
Views: 9537
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 4:25 am Subject: Collector node? Maybe a different design? |
Hey all
I have an issue regarding a design we have and would like to consult with you.
The sending application sends messages with X number of records that changes in every message. The receivin ... |
| Topic: Put error when MQRFH2 exists with utf-16 message |
gilc
Replies: 15
Views: 13547
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:49 am Subject: Re: Put error when MQRFH2 exists with utf-16 message |
The declared fields in an MQ header have fixed byte lengths. The character fields in the MQMD -> MQRFH2 (+ NameValueData) -> message body
the qmgr ccsid (which describes the MQMD character fiel ... |
| Topic: Put error when MQRFH2 exists with utf-16 message |
gilc
Replies: 15
Views: 13547
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:32 am Subject: Re: Put error when MQRFH2 exists with utf-16 message |
What is the complete error message (including BIP error number)?
There it is:
BIP2133E: Source field '0052004600480020' is too long for a target field of length '4' when converting from Unicod ... |
| Topic: Put error when MQRFH2 exists with utf-16 message |
gilc
Replies: 15
Views: 13547
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:39 am Subject: Put error when MQRFH2 exists with utf-16 message |
yep been working with WMB for several years now... and was afraid you were going to suggest that.
oh well, thanks a lot for the help! |
